Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Variance01:15

Variance

The deviations show how spread out the data are about the mean. A positive deviation occurs when the data value exceeds the mean, whereas a negative deviation occurs when the data value is less than the mean. If the deviations are added, the sum is always zero. So one cannot simply add the deviations to get the data spread. By squaring the deviations, the numbers are made positive; thus, their sum will also be positive.The standard deviation measures the spread in the same units as the data.
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
Mean Absolute Deviation01:13

Mean Absolute Deviation

The mean absolute deviation is also a measure of the variability of data in a sample. It is the absolute value of the average difference between the data values and the mean.
Let us consider a dataset containing the number of unsold cupcakes in five shops: 10, 15, 8, 7, and 10. Initially, calculate the sample mean. Then calculate the deviation, or the difference, between each data value and the mean. Next, the absolute values of these deviations are added and divided by the sample size to...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Olaparib as a rescue treatment in platinum-refractory germ-cell tumors: the IGG-02 phase II trial.

ESMO open·2025
Same author

Phase II study of capecitabine-based concomitant chemoradiation followed by durvalumab as a neoadjuvant strategy in locally advanced rectal cancer: the PANDORA trial.

ESMO open·2023
Same author

Non-parametric estimation of the age-at-onset distribution from a cross-sectional sample.

Biometrics·2022
Same author

A population-based study of the prevalence and risk factors of low-grade Plasmodium falciparum malaria infection in children aged 0-15 years old in northern Tanzania.

Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH·2019
Same author

Sex steroid hormones in relation to Barrett's esophagus: an analysis of the FINBAR Study.

Andrology·2017
Same author

Gastric GISTs: Analysis of c-Kit, PDGFRA and BRAF mutations in relation to prognosis and clinical pathological characteristics of patients - A GIRCG study.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Variance computations for functional of absolute risk estimates.

R M Pfeiffer1, E Petracci

  • 1Biostatistics Branch, DCEG, National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Blvd, EPS/8030, Bethesda, MD 20892-7244, USA.

Statistics & Probability Letters
|June 7, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a new method using influence functions to calculate the uncertainty of absolute risk estimates. This approach helps assess how changes in risk factors affect breast cancer risk for individuals and populations.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
13:04

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods

Published on: September 19, 2012

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Risk Prediction Modeling

Background:

  • Estimating absolute risk is crucial for personalized medicine and public health interventions.
  • Assessing the impact of risk factor changes on absolute risk requires robust statistical methods.
  • Current methods for variance estimation can be computationally intensive or lack theoretical grounding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel, simple influence function-based approach for computing variances of absolute risk estimates.
  • To apply this method to evaluate the impact of risk factor distribution changes on absolute risk.
  • To compare the proposed variance estimates with bootstrap methods.

Main Methods:

  • Developed an influence function-based methodology for variance estimation of absolute risk.
  • Applied the method to assess the effects of risk factor modifications on individual and population-level absolute risk.
  • Utilized a breast cancer absolute risk prediction model incorporating modifiable and standard risk factors for illustration.

Main Results:

  • Influence function-based variance estimates were successfully computed for absolute risk and related criteria.
  • The approach provided a computationally efficient alternative to bootstrap variance estimation.
  • Demonstrated the utility of the method in a practical breast cancer risk prediction scenario.

Conclusions:

  • The influence function-based approach offers a simple and effective method for variance estimation in absolute risk prediction.
  • This method facilitates the assessment of risk factor impacts on absolute risk at both individual and population levels.
  • The findings support the use of influence functions for robust uncertainty quantification in risk prediction models.