Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cortical representation of motion sequence processing in younger and older adults: an fMRI study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Dissociation in cross-feature integration between behavioral and pupil dilation responses in auditory deviant detection.

iScience·2026
Same author

Pupillary responses to invisible brightness escape from attentional modulation.

iScience·2026
Same author

Gelsemine induces apoptosis through a reactive oxygen species- and MAPK/JNK1/2-coregulated pathway in tongue squamous cell carcinoma cells.

Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology·2026
Same author

Comparison of User Performance and Experience Between Light Field and Conventional AR Glasses.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2025
Same author

Selective activation of ipRGC modulates working memory performance.

PloS one·2025
Same journal

Exploring themes in music therapy: A scoping review.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Human-robot collaboration and customer-directed spillover: A daily diary study of state job apathy.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Feedback is associated with higher subjective values of n-Back levels in effort discounting.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Understanding Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in university students: Exploring the roles of neurotic perfectionism, parental perception, and stressful life events.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Tailoring instruction to personality: The mediating role of cognitive tendencies in the effect of extraversion on higher vocational college students' self-regulated learning.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same journal

Physical activity and loneliness in rural left-behind children: The mediating roles of social anxiety and self-concept.

Acta psychologica·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Interaction between stimulus-driven orienting and top-down modulation in attentional capture.

Hsin-I Liao1, Su-Ling Yeh

  • 1Department of Psychology, Institute of Brain and Mind Sciences, Center for Neurobiology and Cognitive Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Acta Psychologica
|June 8, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Attentional capture is influenced by both stimulus-driven and top-down factors. Unexpected cues reveal stimulus-driven attention, while consistent cues show top-down modulation, suggesting interactive processing.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Attention

Background:

  • The debate on whether attentional capture is primarily driven by external stimuli or internal goals remains unresolved.
  • Understanding attentional capture mechanisms is crucial for explaining visual perception and information processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the interplay between stimulus-driven and top-down factors in attentional capture.
  • To differentiate the roles of cue modality (color vs. onset) and trial predictability in visual attention.

Main Methods:

  • A spatial cueing paradigm was employed with varying set sizes (four and eight).
  • Uninformative color or onset cues preceded a color target, with the inclusion of no-cue trials to create unexpected cueing conditions.
  • Analysis focused on both first-trial effects (to isolate stimulus-driven capture) and average data (reflecting overall effects).

Main Results:

  • Onset cues demonstrated stimulus-driven attentional capture on the first trial at both set sizes.
  • Average data for onset cues showed capture at set size eight but not four, indicating set-size dependent top-down modulation.
  • Color cues exhibited attentional capture in average data but not on the first trial, suggesting a stronger top-down influence or slower stimulus-driven effect.

Conclusions:

  • Attentional capture is a result of interactive processing, beginning with early stimulus-driven activation.
  • Subsequent top-down modulation refines attentional allocation, with cue modality and predictability influencing the balance between these processes.
  • The findings reconcile conflicting evidence by demonstrating that both stimulus-driven and top-down mechanisms contribute to attentional capture.