Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Transradial and transulnar access for percutaneous coronary interventions
1University Clinic of Cardiology, Medical Faculty Skopje, Macedonia. skedev@mt.net.mk
Insights
The transradial approach (TRA) for percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduces bleeding and vascular complications compared to the transfemoral approach. TRA offers greater safety and benefits for high-risk patients, improving outcomes and reducing hospital stays.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Access Techniques
Background:
- Periprocedural bleeding and vascular complications following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are linked to adverse clinical outcomes and increased mortality.
- Transfemoral approach (TFA) in PCI accounts for over 80% of major bleeding events due to vascular access site complications.
- Pharmacological strategies have been the focus for reducing bleeding risk, but access site choice may offer greater benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the benefits of the transradial approach (TRA) in minimizing bleeding and vascular complications during PCI.
- To identify patient populations who may particularly benefit from TRA due to increased risk factors.
- To compare the efficacy of TRA versus TFA in reducing vascular access-related complications.
Main Methods:
- Review and synthesis of clinical trial data comparing transfemoral and transradial access for PCI.
- Analysis of bleeding event rates and vascular complication incidence between the two approaches.
- Evaluation of patient outcomes, satisfaction, and resource utilization associated with TRA.
Main Results:
- Transradial approach (TRA) virtually eliminates access site bleeding and vascular complications, unlike the transfemoral approach (TFA).
- High-risk patient groups, including those with acute coronary syndrome, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, women, obese, and elderly individuals, show significant benefit from TRA.
- TRA is associated with improved patient satisfaction, reduced healthcare costs, and shorter hospital stays, enabling outpatient PCI.
Conclusions:
- Adopting a transradial rather than a transfemoral access strategy for PCI can lead to greater reductions in bleeding complications than pharmacological interventions alone.
- TRA enhances patient safety and may be the preferred approach for high-risk populations undergoing PCI.
- The benefits of TRA extend to improved patient experience and resource efficiency, facilitating same-day discharge for uncomplicated procedures.
Abstract:
Periprocedural bleeding and vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are associated with worse clinical outcomes and increased short- and long-term mortality. Vascular access-related bleeding accounts for more than 80% of all major bleeding events in PCI performed by the transfemoral approach. Transradial approach (TRA), on the other hand, virtually eliminates access site bleeding and vascular complications. Although clinical trials have mostly evaluated different pharmacological strategies for reducing bleeding risk, adoption of a radial rather than a femoral access may allow greater reductions in bleeding complications than pharmacological strategies alone. High-risk patients such as those with acute coronary syndrome and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, women, obese patients, and elderly subjects who are at increased risk for vascular complications and bleeding might particularly benefit from the radial approach. Besides increased patient safety, the TRA is associated with improved patient satisfaction, reduced cost, and length of hospital stay, thus allowing outpatient performance of uncomplicated PCI.
Related Concept Videos
Parentral Nutrition: Centeral and Peripheral Parental Nutrition
PN can be administered through two primary routes:
1. Central Parenteral Nutrition (CPN):
CPN involves delivering a high concentration of nutrients through a large vein. This is typically achieved using a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) or,...
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
