Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
P-value01:10

P-value

P-value is one of the most crucial concepts in statistics.
P-value stands for the probability value.  P-value is the probability that, if the null hypothesis is true, the results from another randomly selected sample will be as extreme or more extreme as the results obtained from the given sample.
A large P-value calculated from the data indicates to  not reject the null hypothesis. But a higher P-value does not mean that the null hypothesis is true. The smaller the P-value, the more unlikely...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bolstering Primary Care and Pharmacy Collaboration as a Solution to Health Care Workforce, Access and Affordability Issues.

North Carolina medical journal·2026
Same author

Lessons Learned From Helene: The Role of a Rural Community Hospital in Disaster Response After a Major Hurricane.

Annals of emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Screening and Counseling for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Primary Care Practices.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Maggot infestation leading to Ignatzschineria larvae bacteremia and bladder outlet obstruction.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same author

The great imitator: Hyperkalemia presenting with paralysis and ST segment elevations.

The American journal of emergency medicine·2025
Same author

In Search of Shared Language: Professional Associations and Interprofessional Practice in North Carolina.

North Carolina medical journal·2024
Same journal

Does taking BP medicine at night (vs morning) result in fewer cardiovascular events?

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

Preventing RSV in children and adults: A vaccine update.

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

Essential oils: How safe? How effective?

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

51-year-old woman • History of Graves disease • General fatigue, palpitations, and hand tremors • Dx?

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

Renewing the dream.

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

55-year-old woman • Myalgias and progressive symmetrical proximal weakness • History of unilateral renal agenesis, type 2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia • Dx?

The Journal of family practice·2023
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes
05:07

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

PURLs: PSA testing: when it's useful, when it's not.

Susan Slatkoff1, Stephen Gamboa, Adam J Zolotor

  • 1Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

The Journal of Family Practice
|June 8, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing increases prostate cancer diagnoses but does not improve survival rates. However, certain patient groups may experience a slight benefit from this screening method.

More Related Videos

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data
08:35

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Published on: June 24, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes
05:07

Rup (RNA-seq Usability Assessment Pipeline) - Quality Control for Bulk RNA-seq Experiments in Eukaryotes

Published on: November 7, 2025

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data
08:35

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data

Published on: June 24, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is a common screening tool for prostate cancer.
  • The clinical utility and impact of routine PSA screening on mortality remain subjects of ongoing research and debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effect of routine prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing on prostate cancer diagnosis and patient survival.
  • To identify specific subgroups of men who may benefit from PSA screening.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from large-scale studies on prostate cancer screening.
  • Comparison of outcomes between screened and unscreened populations.
  • Subgroup analysis to identify differential effects of PSA testing.

Main Results:

  • Routine PSA testing significantly increases the detection rate of prostate cancer.
  • Overall, routine PSA testing does not demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in prostate cancer-specific mortality.
  • A specific subset of men may experience a marginal survival benefit from early detection via PSA screening.

Conclusions:

  • While routine PSA screening elevates prostate cancer diagnoses, its broad impact on saving lives is not established.
  • The findings suggest a need for personalized screening strategies, as certain populations may benefit more than others.