Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Relationships and Well-Being01:30

Social Relationships and Well-Being

327
The significance of social relationships in psychological well-being is a well-established area of inquiry within social psychology. Research consistently demonstrates that the presence of meaningful, supportive relationships enhances emotional health, while the absence or deterioration of such connections can contribute to psychological distress. Relationships serve as a foundation for emotional support, identity, and social belonging, all of which are critical to an individual’s overall...
327
Relationship Growth01:27

Relationship Growth

225
Interpersonal relationships progress through stages, beginning with awareness and moving toward mutuality, where emotional connections deepen. While many relationships remain at moderate levels of mutuality, deeper connections form through self-disclosure, trust, and interdependence.Self-DisclosureSelf-disclosure involves revealing personal information, starting with surface-level details and gradually progressing to more intimate content. As trust grows, individuals feel more comfortable...
225
Ending Relationships01:28

Ending Relationships

201
The dissolution of intimate relationships presents complex emotional and psychological challenges, particularly when emotional bonds are strong, the relationship is long-standing, and perceived alternatives are limited. This distress often intensifies in romantic breakups, where the initiator may experience greater turmoil than the rejected partner. Contributing factors include residual attachment, guilt over causing pain, and uncertainty about how to manage the situation. The stress is further...
201
Close Relationships and Culture01:29

Close Relationships and Culture

246
Culture shapes how people approach attraction, choose partners, and build long-term relationships. While some preferences in mate selection appear consistent across cultures, such as men valuing physical attractiveness and women emphasizing financial resources, cultural contexts influence how these preferences are expressed and prioritized. Marriage extends beyond romantic ideals in many societies and is deeply embedded in social, economic, and religious frameworks.The Role of Culture in Mate...
246
Dose-Response Relationship: Overview01:03

Dose-Response Relationship: Overview

5.2K
Agonists can bind with and activate receptors, resulting in the formation of drug-receptor complexes. Once formed, these complexes catalyze many biochemical processes at the cellular level and subsequently induce a pharmacologic response. The degree of response is directly proportional to the fraction of activated receptors, which in turn, depends on the concentration of the drug at the receptor site as well as the sensitivity of the receptor. An increase in the administered dose contributes to...
5.2K
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

46.3K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
46.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chromosome number variation and repeatome dynamics in Nicotiana section Suaveolentes (Solanaceae).

Annals of botany·2026
Same author

Population genetics and phylogenomic insights into the origin of economically important black pepper (Piper nigrum).

American journal of botany·2026
Same author

Molecular Phylogenetics and Morphological Analyses Support <i>Dolichopoda</i>, a New Neotropical Genus of Marantaceae (Zingiberales).

Plants (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Unequally Abundant Chromosomes and Unusual Collections of Transferred Sequences Characterize Mitochondrial Genomes of Gastrodia (Orchidaceae), One of the Largest Mycoheterotrophic Plant Genera.

Molecular biology and evolution·2025
Same author

Correction: Phylogenomics of angiosperms based on mitochondrial genes: insights into deep node relationships.

BMC biology·2025
Same author

Phylogenomics of angiosperms based on mitochondrial genes: insights into deep node relationships.

BMC biology·2025
Same journal

Species-specific thermal thresholds for postdispersal embryo growth in Apiaceae.

American journal of botany·2026
Same journal

Taxonomic reassessment of fossil Sequoia and Protosequoia from the Upper Miocene of Central Honshu, Japan, with implications for leaf morphological variation in extant S. sempervirens.

American journal of botany·2026
Same journal

Biomechanics and anatomical investigation on the nodes and internodes of an arborescent monocotyledon.

American journal of botany·2026
Same journal

Erratum to "Phylogenomics resolves the evolutionary histories and taxonomy of the long-associated North American legume genera Psorodendron and Psorothamnus".

American journal of botany·2026
Same journal

Recovery of California black walnut (Juglans californica) trees from drought, fire, and biotic stress: Is resprouting an elixir?

American journal of botany·2026
Same journal

Linking community structure and climate vulnerability in desert plant assemblages of southern California.

American journal of botany·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Combining Volumetric Capnography And Barometric Plethysmography To Measure The Lung Structure-function Relationship
08:25

Combining Volumetric Capnography And Barometric Plethysmography To Measure The Lung Structure-function Relationship

Published on: January 8, 2019

10.0K

Monocot relationships: an overview.

Mark W Chase1

  • 1Molecular Systematics Section, Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK.

American Journal of Botany
|June 10, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Phylogenetic analysis of seven genes has clarified monocot relationships, revealing their ancient origins. Further genomic data are needed to fully resolve remaining evolutionary uncertainties in this major angiosperm group.

More Related Videos

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web
09:51

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

16.1K
Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

14.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Combining Volumetric Capnography And Barometric Plethysmography To Measure The Lung Structure-function Relationship
08:25

Combining Volumetric Capnography And Barometric Plethysmography To Measure The Lung Structure-function Relationship

Published on: January 8, 2019

10.0K
Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web
09:51

Investigating Protein Sequence-structure-dynamics Relationships with Bio3D-web

Published on: July 16, 2017

16.1K
Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila
06:00

Experimental Manipulation of Body Size to Estimate Morphological Scaling Relationships in Drosophila

Published on: October 1, 2011

14.4K

Area of Science:

  • * Botany
  • * Evolutionary Biology
  • * Molecular Phylogenetics

Background:

  • * Monocots (monocotyledonous plants) were historically poorly understood phylogenetically.
  • * Recent advancements have transformed our understanding of monocot evolutionary history.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships among major monocot clades.
  • * To establish the evolutionary timeline and divergence of monocot lineages.

Main Methods:

  • * Analysis of DNA sequences from seven genes across nuclear, plastid, and mitochondrial genomes.
  • * Phylogenetic tree construction using molecular data.
  • * Comparison with available morphological data.

Main Results:

  • * Established a robust phylogeny for many monocot orders, including Acorales, Alismatales, Dioscoreales/Pandanales, Liliales, Asparagales, and Poales.
  • * Identified a polytomy among Arecales, Commelinales/Zingiberales, Dasypogonaceae, and Poales, indicating unresolved relationships.
  • * Dated monocot origins to at least 140 million years ago, with major diversification before the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event.

Conclusions:

  • * Molecular data have significantly advanced monocot phylogeny, resolving many previously uncertain relationships.
  • * Further genomic sequencing, particularly from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA, is crucial for clarifying the placement of specific orders and families.
  • * The study provides a foundational framework for future research into monocot evolution.