Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026
07:15
Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
Published on: December 18, 2020
Repairing faulty scripts to reduce speeding behaviour in young drivers
Prasannah Prabhakharan1, Brett R C Molesworth
1School of Aviation, The University of New South Wales, Australia. p.prabhakharan@unsw.edu.au
Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|June 11, 2011
Summary
Personalized feedback after a simulated drive significantly reduced speeding in young drivers. This targeted training approach shows promise for improving road safety and curbing risky driving behaviors.
Area of Science:
- Road safety research
- Cognitive psychology
- Traffic behavior analysis
Background:
- Young drivers (under 25) are disproportionately involved in motor vehicle accidents globally.
- Speeding is a major contributing factor to these accidents, presenting an ongoing challenge for intervention.
- Cognitive engagement strategies, successful in aviation, offer a potential model for improving driver risk management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a training program designed to reduce speeding tendencies in young drivers.
- To investigate if personalized feedback following a driving simulation can modify speeding behavior.
- To compare the impact of personalized feedback with other training methods like reading accident case studies.
Main Methods:
- 58 young motorists (16-24 years) participated in a study with training and testing sessions.
- Participants were assigned to groups receiving different training: accident case studies, rules, simulated drive with personalized feedback, or a control task.
- Key metrics included percentage of distance speeding and frequency of zone violations during a simulated test drive.
Main Results:
- Personalized feedback after a simulated drive significantly decreased speeding behavior in the test session compared to the control group.
- Training involving reading accident cases, with or without associated rules, did not significantly impact speeding behavior.
- A statistically significant reduction in speeding was observed with personalized feedback (p < .017).
Conclusions:
- Training programs incorporating active engagement and personalized feedback post-driving episode appear effective in reducing young drivers' speeding.
- The findings support the application of cognitive engagement principles to enhance road safety interventions.
- Results offer practical implications for developing targeted driver training to mitigate speeding risks.
Related Concept Videos
02:10Social Scripts
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter), the opening...
01:42Schemas
A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.
01:41Social Traps
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned more cows, the larger...
01:25The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...