Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Symbiosis

Symbiosis

Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...

Competition

Competition

When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.

Relationship Formation

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...

Inclusive Fitness

Inclusive Fitness

Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.

Microbial Interactions: Competition

Microbial Interactions: Competition

Microbial competition is an ecological interaction in which microorganisms vie for limited resources within shared environments. These resources may include nutrients, space, or light, depending on the system. The intensity and outcome of competition are influenced by the environmental context, such as nutrient availability, spatial constraints, and the diversity of microbial species present. These competitive interactions significantly influence the structure, function, and resilience of...

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation

Microbial Interactions: Cooperation

Microbial cooperation involves beneficial interactions in which different species work together for individual or mutual advantage. These interactions can profoundly influence ecological dynamics and evolutionary processes, and they are essential to many pathogenic and symbiotic relationships.Nematode–Bacteria CooperationA striking example is the relationship between the Gram-negative bacterium Xenorhabdus nematophila and the parasitic nematode Steinernema carpocapsae. Juvenile nematodes...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Analysis of the impact of gene evolution on reproductive effects reveals prevalent sexual and germline-soma conflicts.

Nature ecology & evolution·2026

Same author

Global stability of ecological and evolutionary dynamics via equivalence.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Robust coexistence in competitive ecological communities.

Nature communications·2026

Same author

Effects of Phylogeny on Coexistence in Model Communities.

The American naturalist·2025

Same author

Phylogeny structures species' interactions in experimental ecological communities.

Ecology letters·2024

Same author

Coexistence of many species under a random competition-colonization trade-off.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

Interaction rules affect species coexistence in intransitive networks.

José Rojas-Echenique¹, Stefano Allesina

¹Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.

|June 14, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Intransitive communities can maintain biodiversity. Asymmetric competition rules promote species coexistence through negative frequency dependence, unlike symmetric rules.

More Related Videos

Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores

Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores

Published on: March 26, 2019

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Experimental Protocol for Manipulating Plant-induced Soil Heterogeneity

Published on: March 13, 2014

Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores

Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores

Published on: March 26, 2019

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Area of Science:

Ecology
Theoretical Ecology
Biodiversity Research

Background:

Intransitive communities, lacking a clear hierarchy of species dominance, are crucial for understanding biodiversity maintenance.
Previous research has explored theoretical and empirical models of intransitivity to explain species coexistence.
The specific rules governing species interactions significantly influence community dynamics and biodiversity levels.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how variations in interaction rules within intransitive competition models affect species coexistence and biodiversity.
To determine the impact of interaction symmetry versus asymmetry on community stability and species diversity.
To compare the macroscopic outcomes of asymmetric and symmetric competition under different spatial scales (global vs. local).

Main Methods:

Development and analysis of mathematical models for intransitive competition.
Simulation of ecological interactions with modified competition rules (asymmetric vs. symmetric).
Examination of frequency dependence and its role in promoting species coexistence.

Main Results:

Asymmetric interactions, where individuals can be outcompeted but not outcompete, generate negative frequency dependence, promoting coexistence.
Symmetric interactions, where individuals can both outcompete and be outcompeted, eliminate negative frequency dependence, altering coexistence levels.
Macroscopic patterns show that asymmetric competition maximizes biodiversity under global competition, while symmetric competition favors biodiversity under local competition.

Conclusions:

The degree of symmetry in species interactions critically influences biodiversity maintenance in intransitive communities.
Negative frequency dependence, driven by asymmetric competition, is a key mechanism for promoting species coexistence.
Spatial scale interacts with interaction symmetry to determine the conditions favoring highest biodiversity.