Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Chemical Reversion of Conventional Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to a Naïve-like State with Improved Multilineage Differentiation Potency
Published on: June 10, 2018
Democracy derived? New trajectories in pluripotent stem cell research
Christopher Thomas Scott1, Jennifer B McCormick, Mindy C DeRouen
1Stanford University Center for Biomedical Ethics Program on Stem Cells and Society, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5417, USA. cscott@stanford.edu
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) complement, not replace, human embryonic stem cells. Funding bans on embryonic stem cell research may negatively impact hiPSC development.
Area of Science:
- Stem cell biology
- Biomedical research
Background:
- Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) represent a significant advancement in regenerative medicine.
- Understanding the relationship between hiPSCs and human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) is crucial for future research directions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact of hiPSC development on the broader field of stem cell research.
- To investigate the relationship between hiPSCs and hESCs in scientific literature and research practices.
Main Methods:
- Coauthorship network analysis of stem cell research publications.
- Bibliometric analysis of cell line usage in stem cell research.
Main Results:
- hiPSCs are not replacing hESCs; they function as complementary and interdependent research tools.
- The development of hiPSCs has expanded, rather than supplanted, stem cell research avenues.
Conclusions:
- Continued research and funding for both hiPSCs and hESCs are essential for scientific progress.
- Policy decisions, such as funding bans on hESC research, could have unforeseen negative consequences for the advancement of hiPSC technology.
Related Concept Videos
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Somatic cells are...
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Stem Cell Culture
Maintenance of the ES Cell State
Embryonic Stem Cells