Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
First Impression01:09

First Impression

First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sweating it out: The influence of sex and emotions on human sweat production.

Biological psychology·2025
Same author

Investigating Inattentional Blindness Through the Lens of Fear Chemosignals.

Psychological science·2023
Same author

Emotional self-body odors do not influence the access to visual awareness by emotional faces.

Chemical senses·2023
Same author

Comparing fear and anxiety chemosignals: Do they modulate facial muscle activity and facilitate identifying facial expressions?

Chemical senses·2023
Same author

When are puppies receptive to emotion-induced human chemosignals? The cases of fear and happiness.

Animal cognition·2023
Same author

Validation of the open biological negative image set for a Portuguese population: Comparing Japanese and Portuguese samples and an exploration of low-order visual properties of the stimuli.

Behavior research methods·2023
Same journal

Interactive effects of age and mindfulness on emotion regulation flexibility: Evidence from a daily diary study.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Childhood threat exposure and poor emotional awareness predict neural correlates of emotion regulation in adolescent girls.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Intensity, desirability, and attainability: Predictors of effort in emotion regulation among healthy and depressed individuals.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

Effort shapes empathy: Distinct aftereffects of cognitive and physical exertion on pain empathy.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

An unequal exchange: A within-person examination of conversation role on intra- and interpersonal outcomes of co-ruminative conversations.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
Same journal

The interdependence of emotion regulation in romantic couples: A longitudinal dyadic analysis of six strategies.

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

When does mimicry affect evaluative judgment?

Francesco Foroni1, Gün R Semin

  • 1Faculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. F.Foroni@uu.nl

Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
|June 15, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Subliminal happy faces boost cartoon enjoyment, but only if your face can move freely. Blocking facial mimicry negates this emotional effect, highlighting embodied cognition.

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task
12:10

Assessment of Mouse Judgment Bias through an Olfactory Digging Task

Published on: March 4, 2022

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm
06:35

Examining Recall Memory in Infancy and Early Childhood Using the Elicited Imitation Paradigm

Published on: April 28, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Affective Science
  • Embodied Cognition

Background:

  • Facial expressions are crucial for social communication and emotional understanding.
  • Embodied cognition theories suggest bodily states influence psychological processes, including emotion.
  • The role of facial mimicry in processing subliminal emotional cues remains an area of investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine how subliminally presented facial expressions (happy vs. angry) affect evaluative judgments.
  • To determine the moderating role of facial muscle mimicry (free vs. blocked) in this process.
  • To explore the influence of embodied processes on affective judgments and emotional contagion.

Main Methods:

  • Participants viewed subliminally presented happy or angry faces.
  • Evaluative judgments of neutral stimuli (cartoons) were recorded.
  • Facial muscle mimicry was manipulated by either allowing free movement or blocking it.

Main Results:

  • Subliminal happy faces led to more positive cartoon judgments than angry faces, but only when facial mimicry was not blocked.
  • Blocking facial mimicry eliminated the differential effect of happy versus angry subliminal faces on judgments.
  • This indicates that facial feedback plays a role in processing subliminal emotional information.

Conclusions:

  • Socially driven embodied processes, specifically facial mimicry, significantly influence affective judgments.
  • The findings support theories linking bodily states to emotional perception and evaluation.
  • These results have implications for understanding emotional contagion and non-conscious emotional processing.