Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 1, 2026

Measuring Local Anaphylaxis in Mice
Published on: October 14, 2014
Improving anaphylaxis management in a pediatric emergency department
E Arroabarren1, E M Lasa, I Olaciregui
1Emergency Unit, Pediatrics Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, Spain. esoziaa@yahoo.es
Insights
An updated anaphylaxis protocol significantly improved pediatric emergency care, increasing epinephrine use and self-injecting epinephrine prescriptions. The protocol enhanced physician management skills with no significant adverse effects observed from epinephrine administration.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Allergy and Immunology
- Clinical Protocol Development
Background:
- Management of anaphylaxis in pediatric emergency units (PEU) often shows deficiencies in diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.
- There is a need to assess the effectiveness of updated protocols to improve medical performance in managing pediatric anaphylaxis.
- Understanding the incidence of anaphylaxis and the safety of epinephrine use in a PEU is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficiency of an updated anaphylaxis management protocol in a pediatric emergency unit.
- To determine the incidence of anaphylaxis in children under 14 years old.
- To assess the safety of epinephrine administration in the pediatric emergency setting.
Main Methods:
- A before-and-after comparative study was conducted using clinical histories of children diagnosed with anaphylaxis.
- Data were collected from 2006-2007 (pre-protocol) and 2008-2009 (post-protocol).
- Key metrics included anaphylaxis incidence, epinephrine use, self-injecting epinephrine prescription, admissions, length of stay, and adverse events.
Main Results:
- Anaphylaxis incidence was 4.8 per 10,000 cases/year.
- Post-protocol implementation, epinephrine administration increased from 27% to 57.6%, and self-injecting epinephrine prescriptions rose from 6.7% to 54.5%.
- Significant improvements were noted in hospital admissions, reduced corticosteroid monotherapy, and better patient discharge instructions, with epinephrine use showing no significant adverse effects.
Conclusions:
- The implemented anaphylaxis protocol significantly enhanced physician management skills in the pediatric emergency unit.
- Epinephrine administration, a critical treatment for anaphylaxis, was found to be safe in this pediatric population.
- The study highlights the positive impact of protocol updates on pediatric anaphylaxis care.
Background:
The management of anaphylaxis in pediatric emergency units (PEU) is sometimes deficient in terms of diagnosis, treatment, and subsequent follow-up. The aims of this study were to assess the efficiency of an updated protocol to improve medical performance, and to describe the incidence of anaphylaxis and the safety of epinephrine use in a PEU in a tertiary hospital.
Methods:
We performed a before-after comparative study with independent samples through review of the clinical histories of children aged <14 years old diagnosed with anaphylaxis in the PEU according to the criteria of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI). Two allergists and a pediatrician reviewed the discharge summaries codified according to the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) as urticaria, acute urticaria, angioedema, angioneurotic edema, unspecified allergy, and anaphylactic shock. Patients were divided into two groups according to the date of implantation of the protocol (2008): group A (2006-2007; the period before the introduction of the protocol) and group B (2008-2009; after the introduction of the protocol). We evaluated the incidence of anaphylaxis, epinephrine administration, prescription of self-injecting epinephrine (SIE), other drugs administered, the percentage of admissions and length of stay in the pediatric emergency observation area (PEOA), referrals to the allergy department, and the safety of epinephrine use.
Results:
During the 4 years of the study, 133,591 children were attended in the PEU, 1673 discharge summaries were reviewed, and 64 cases of anaphylaxis were identified. The incidence of anaphylaxis was 4.8 per 10,000 cases/year. After the introduction of the protocol, significant increases were observed in epinephrine administration (27% in group A and 57.6% in group B) (p = 0.012), in prescription of SIE (6.7% in group A and 54.5% in group B) (p = 0.005) and in the number of admissions to the PEOA (p = 0.003) and their duration (p = 0.005). Reductions were observed in the use of corticosteroid monotherapy (29% in group A, 3% in group B) (p = 0.005), and in patients discharged without follow-up instructions (69% in group A, 22% in group B) (p = 0.001). Thirty-three epinephrine doses were administered. Precordial palpitations were observed in one patient.
Conclusion:
The application of the anaphylaxis protocol substantially improved the physicians' skills to manage this emergency in the PEU. Epinephrine administration showed no significant adverse effects.
Related Concept Videos
Allergic Reactions: Anaphylaxis
Allergic Reactions
Adrenergic Agonists: Therapeutic Uses
Emergency and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) applications: Pressor agents increase blood pressure, heart rate, and contractility in shock and organ failure situations. Dopamine can induce vasodilation and stimulate adrenoceptors. Endogenous catecholamines are effective in treating cardiogenic shock. α2-agonists like clonidine can reverse anesthesia-induced hypertension.
Allergies and anaphylaxis:...
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Asthma-IV: Nursing Management
First, in...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

