Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computer assisted surgery for knee ligament reconstruction.

Duncan E Meuffels1, Max Reijman, Rob Jpm Scholten

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3000 CA.

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|June 17, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Adductor Tenotomy to Treat Progressive Hip Migration in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Identifying Predictors of Success to Guide Clinical Practice.

Journal of pediatric orthopedics·2026
Same author

Longitudinal quantitative T2 mapping and SPECT-CT assessment of unloading therapy within a randomized controlled trial for medial knee osteoarthritis.

Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery·2026
Same author

A Wearable Leg Support for Surgical Ergonomics in Knee Arthroscopy.

Arthroscopy techniques·2025
Same author

PhysiotherApeutic Treat-To-Target Intervention After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Improve Outcomes Compared to Usual Physical Therapy: The PATIO Study.

The Journal of arthroplasty·2025
Same author

The Scolioscope: a home detection tool for measuring axial trunk rotation in scoliosis-a validation study.

Spine deformity·2025
Same author

The Role of Physical Examination in Assessing Hip Migration in Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction shows no significant difference in patient outcomes compared to conventional methods. More research is needed due to insufficient evidence regarding the benefits of CAS in knee ligament surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a common orthopedic procedure.
  • Graft malpositioning is a frequent cause of ACL reconstruction failure.
  • Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) aims to improve graft placement accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of CAS versus conventional techniques for ACL and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in adults.
  • To compare patient-reported outcomes and objective knee function measures between CAS and conventional methods.
  • To identify any differences in adverse events and surgical time.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing CAS with conventional ACL/PCL reconstruction.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Searched multiple databases including Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL up to March 2010.
  • Data extraction and analysis by two independent reviewers, pooling data using risk ratios and mean differences.
  • Main Results:

    • Four RCTs involving 266 participants were included, all focusing on ACL reconstruction.
    • No statistically significant differences were found in self-reported quality of life (IKDC, Lysholm scores) or objective knee function at two years or more follow-up.
    • CAS was associated with longer operating times, but adverse effects were minimal and comparable between groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Current evidence is insufficient to demonstrate or refute a favorable effect of CAS for cruciate ligament reconstructions.
    • Further high-quality studies with improved reporting are necessary to guide the use of CAS technology.
    • Clinicians cannot be advised for or against CAS based on the available evidence.