Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Determination of Continuity Index Values in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation with Proactive Esophageal Cooling
Published on: April 19, 2024
Importance of evaluating conduction block in radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation
Borut Gersak1, Andy C Kiser, Krzysztof Bartus
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Zaloska 7, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. bgersak@maat.si
Insights
Confirming exit block after surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly improves patient outcomes. Beating-heart ablation provides critical intra-operative feedback for successful AF treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
- Electrophysiology
Background:
- Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia often inadequately treated by anti-arrhythmic drugs due to limited efficacy and adverse effects.
- Surgical ablation is an alternative therapy for AF, with ongoing research into optimizing procedural techniques and outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the significance of assessing exit block during surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).
- To determine if confirming exit block impacts clinical success rates after beating-heart ablation procedures.
Main Methods:
- Pooled data analysis from a multicenter prospective study of 93 AF patients undergoing ablation with a novel irrigated, vacuum-integrated device.
- Procedures included beating-heart/open-chest and minimally invasive port-access approaches, with ECG/Holter monitoring.
- Outcomes were compared between patients with and without confirmed exit block post-ablation.
Main Results:
- Overall, 83% of patients were free from AF at 341 days' follow-up.
- Patients with confirmed exit block showed significantly higher rates of being AF-free (100% vs. 62%), in sinus rhythm (87% vs. 57%), and off anti-arrhythmic drugs (87% vs. 48%) at 12 months compared to those not tested.
- Both surgical approaches reduced left atrial size, and port-access procedures improved left ventricular ejection fraction.
Conclusions:
- Confirmation of exit block following surgical ablation is strongly associated with successful clinical outcomes in AF patients.
- Beating-heart ablation, which allows for intra-operative exit block testing, offers valuable feedback for predicting long-term success.
- This technique may represent an important therapeutic strategy for managing recurrent atrial fibrillation.
Objective:
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequently diagnosed cardiac arrhythmia. Anti-arrhythmic drugs may be used to suppress ectopic foci and interrupt reentry circuits, but are often insufficient to treat recurrent AF and have a number of adverse effects. Alternative therapies, such as catheter and surgical ablation, have been explored. This investigation examines the importance of assessing exit block when performing surgical ablation during beating-heart treatment of AF.
Methods:
This was an evaluation of pooled data from multicenter prospective results obtained in AF patients who received ablation with a new, irrigated, vacuum-integrated device that creates linear lesions during beating-heart/open-chest or minimally invasive, port-access procedures. Electrocardiogram or Holter data were collected intra-operatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcomes were also evaluated for patients who were or 'were not' tested for exit block following the ablation procedure.
Results:
A total of 93 patients were treated (61 open-chest surgeries, 32 port-access procedures). There were no device-related complications and no operative mortality. At 341 days' average follow-up, 71/86 (83%) patients were free from AF, 66/86 (77%) were in sinus rhythm, and 60/86 (70%) were free from AF and off Class I and III anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs). At 12 months, 23/23 (100%) patients with exit block confirmed were AF free compared with 13/21 (62%) patients with exit block not tested (p≤0.01, Fisher's exact test); 20/23 (87%) were in sinus rhythm compared with 12/21 (57%) patients with exit block not tested (p≤0.05, Fisher's exact test); and 20/23 (87%) were AF free without Class I and III AADs compared with 10/21 (48%) patients with exit block not tested (p≤0.01, Fisher's exact test). Both open-chest and port-access procedures yielded decreases in left-atrial size from baseline to 6 months' follow-up. Patients undergoing port-access procedures also observed an increase in left-ventricular ejection fraction, which was also significant at 6 months.
Conclusion:
Patients in whom exit block was confirmed following an ablation procedure were more likely to have successful clinical outcomes. Since testing for exit block must be performed on a beating heart, total epicardial beating-heart ablation may provide an important treatment for AF, providing intra-operative feedback indicative of long-term outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias

