Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Assessment of Morphine-induced Hyperalgesia and Analgesic Tolerance in Mice Using Thermal and Mechanical Nociceptive Modalities
Published on: July 29, 2014
Effect of morphine in needle procedures in children with cancer
Lena E Hedén1, Louise von Essen, Gustaf Ljungman
1Department of Women's and Children's Health, Pediatric Oncology, Uppsala University, Sweden. lena.heden@kbh.uu.se
Insights
Oral morphine did not reduce fear, distress, or pain in children undergoing needle insertion for a subcutaneous port when combined with topical anesthesia. The study found no significant difference compared to placebo, suggesting it offers no additional benefit.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric oncology
- Pain management
- Anesthesiology
Background:
- Subcutaneous implanted intravenous ports are common in pediatric oncology.
- Needle insertion into these ports can cause fear, distress, and pain.
- Topical anesthesia is often used to mitigate procedural discomfort.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of oral morphine compared to placebo in reducing fear, distress, and pain.
- To assess the effect of oral morphine when combined with topical anesthesia during port access in children.
- To determine if a specific dosage of oral morphine (0.25 mg/kg) provides added benefit.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted.
- Fifty pediatric patients (1-18 years) received either oral morphine (0.25 mg/kg) or placebo before needle insertion.
- Fear, distress, and pain were assessed using Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) by parents, nurses, and children (≥7 years), supplemented by observational methods.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed between the morphine and placebo groups in demographic or clinical characteristics.
- Parents, nurses, and children reported no reduction in fear, distress, or pain with oral morphine compared to placebo.
- Statistical analysis could not reject the null hypothesis for an effect size of 15 mm on VAS.
Conclusions:
- Oral morphine at 0.25 mg/kg does not provide additional reduction in fear, distress, or pain compared to placebo when used with topical anesthesia for subcutaneous port needle insertion.
- The findings suggest oral morphine may not be advantageous for this procedure or similar ones like venipuncture and venous cannulation when topical anesthesia is employed.
- Further research may be needed to explore alternative or adjunct pain management strategies.
Background:
The aim was to investigate whether children experience less fear, distress, and/or pain when they receive oral morphine vs. placebo before a needle is inserted in a subcutaneously implanted intravenous port when combined with topical anesthesia.
Method:
Fifty children 1-18 years of age who were treated in a pediatric oncology and hematology setting were included consecutively when undergoing routine needle insertion into an intravenous port. All children were subjected to one needle insertion following topical anesthetic (EMLA) application in this randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing orally administered morphine (n=26) 0.25 mg/kg body weight with placebo (n=24). The patients' fear, distress, and pain were reported by parents, nurses and the children themselves (if ≥ 7 years of age) on 0-100 mm Visual Analogue Scales. In addition, observational methods were used to measure distress and procedure pain.
Results:
No differences between the morphine and the placebo group were found with respect to age, weight, height, physical status, sex, weeks from diagnosis, or weeks from latest needle insertion. According to, parents, nurses, and children, oral morphine at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg body weight did not reduce fear, distress or pain compared with placebo.
Conclusion:
We could not reject the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the oral morphine and placebo groups assuming an effect size of 15 mm on VAS. Therefore it seems that oral morphine at 0.25 mg/kg does not give any additional reduction of fear, distress or pain compared with placebo when combined with topical anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing subcutaneous port needle insertion, and would not be expected to be of any advantage for similar procedures such as venipuncture and venous cannulation when topical anesthesia is used.
Related Concept Videos
Opioid Analgesics: Morphine and Other Natural Cogeners
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Analgesia and Pain Management
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children