Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

ARL Spectral Fitting as an Application to Augment Spectral Data via Franck-Condon Lineshape Analysis and Color Analysis
Published on: August 19, 2021
DFT/TDDFT study on the electronic structures and optoelectronic properties of several red-emitting osmium(II)
Juanjuan Su1, Lili Shi, Xiaobo Sun
1State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Resource Utilization, Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, 130022, P. R. China.
Abstract:
The ground and excited state geometries of several red-emitting phosphors (N^N)(2)Os(P^P) [where N^N = 5-(1-isoquinolyl)-1,2,4-triazoles, P^P = bis(dimethylphosphino)methylene(dmpm) (1); P^P = cis-1,2-bis-(dimethylphosphino)ethene(dmpe) (2); P^P = 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)benzene(dmpb) (3); P^P = 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)naphthalene(dmpn) (4); P^P = 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)-4-cyano-benzene(dmpcb) (5)] have been investigated by using the density functional theory (DFT) methods. The calculated results indicate that, for the studied complexes, the electron-transporting performance is better than the hole-transporting performance. The alteration of cis-P^P ancillary ligands with different conjugation lengths and substituents has an impact on the optoelectronic properties of these complexes, especially the electron-withdrawing group -CN in 5. The calculated energy gaps are nearly the same for complexes 1 to 4 (3.34 eV), while for 5, the HOMO and LUMO energies are lowered and the energy gap increases (3.42 eV). The absorption of 1 is red shifted, while that of 5 is blue shifted compared with the absorptions of 2, 3, and 4, which have similar absorptions. Complexes 2, 3, and 4 have almost identical emission wavelength 699 nm, while 1 (715 nm) and 5 (735 nm) are red shifted. The calculated electron affinities and reorganization energies indicate that complex 5 is the easiest for electron injection and has the best electron-transporting performance.
More Related Videos
06:08Time-resolved Photophysical Characterization of Triplet-harvesting Organic Compounds at an Oxygen-free Environment Using an iCCD Camera
Published on: December 27, 2018
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human eye.
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Valence Bond Theory
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
UV–Vis Spectroscopy: Molecular Electronic Transitions
Properties of Transition Metals