Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Impact Assessment of Repeated Exposure of Organotypic 3D Bronchial and Nasal Tissue Culture Models to Whole Cigarette Smoke
Published on: February 12, 2015
Reduction in acute myocardial infarction hospitalization after implementation of a smoking ordinance
Gerrit Bruintjes1, Becki Bucher Bartelson, Paul Hurst
1Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, USA.
Insights
A public smoking ordinance in Greeley, Colorado, was linked to fewer hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The reduction was most significant among smokers, challenging previous assumptions about smoke-free policy benefits.
Area of Science:
- Public health
- Cardiovascular epidemiology
- Environmental health policy
Background:
- Previous studies suggest smoking ordinances reduce acute myocardial infarction (AMI) rates, but often lack patient-level data.
- Understanding the impact of smoking bans on AMI hospitalizations is crucial for public health policy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if a smoking ordinance reduced hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
- To assess the association irrespective of patient smoking status or infarct type (ST elevation vs. non-ST elevation).
Main Methods:
- Utilized detailed chart abstraction of biomarkers to confirm first AMI events.
- Analyzed data from a single community hospital serving Greeley, Colorado, and adjacent zip codes.
- Employed Poisson regression analysis, adjusted for population growth, to assess changes in incidence rates before and after the ordinance.
Main Results:
- A total of 706 hospitalizations for AMI were identified between July 2002 and June 2006.
- Greeley experienced a significant reduction in AMI hospitalizations post-ordinance (RR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.90).
- The reduction was more pronounced among smokers (RR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29-0.65) than nonsmokers (RR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.67-1.09).
Conclusions:
- The smoking ordinance was associated with a decrease in AMI hospitalizations, aligning with prior research.
- The observed reductions were greatest among smokers, suggesting smoke-free policies may benefit this group directly.
- The study highlights the potential positive impact of smoke-free policies on cardiovascular health, particularly for smokers.
Background:
Smoking ordinances have been associated with reduced acute myocardial infarction rates, but nearly all studies lack patient-level data.
Objective:
We determined whether a smoking ordinance was associated with a reduction in hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction, irrespective of smoking status and infarct presentation (ST elevation vs. non-ST elevation).
Methods:
Detailed chart abstraction of biomarkers to confirm first acute myocardial infarction events was performed from the single community hospital serving Greeley, Colorado and adjacent zip codes, 17 months before and 31 months after implementing a public smoking ordinance. Poisson regression analysis, adjusted for population growth, was used to assess changes in mean incidence rates.
Results:
A total of 706 hospitalizations were identified from July 2002 through June 2006: 482 among Greeley city residents and 224 within adjacent zip code areas. A postordinance reduction in hospitalizations was observed in Greeley (relative risk [RR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.90). A smaller, nonsignificant decrease was noted in the area immediately surrounding Greeley (RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.61-1.14). However, the comparison of relative risk reductions between Greeley and the surrounding area was not significant (P=.48). The reduction in Greeley was more pronounced among smokers (RR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29-0.65) than nonsmokers (RR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.67-1.09) and did not differ by acute myocardial infarction presentation (P=.38).
Conclusions:
A smoking ordinance was associated with a decrease in acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations of a magnitude similar to previous reports, but could not be distinguished from the adjacent geographic area. Reductions were greatest among smokers, despite previous studies suggesting that benefits accrue primarily among nonsmokers. Smoke-free policy may therefore exert a beneficial effect among smokers, who are disproportionately exposed to direct and sidestream smoke.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques IV
Angina IV: Management