Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Single-center experience with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in adults with complex congenital heart disease
Amber D Khanna1, Carole A Warnes, Sabrina D Phillips
1Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Insights
Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) are safe for adults with congenital heart disease. This therapy effectively treats life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, with a low rate of inappropriate shocks in this patient group.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Congenital Heart Disease
Background:
- Adults with congenital heart disease face risks of lethal ventricular arrhythmias.
- Implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy is a potential treatment, but risks and outcomes are not well-defined.
- Understanding ICD performance in this population is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transvenous ICD implantation in adults with congenital heart disease.
- To characterize implant-related complications, long-term outcomes, and rates of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapies.
- To assess the overall benefit of ICD therapy in this high-risk patient group.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of clinical, implantation, and follow-up data for adults with congenital heart disease receiving transvenous ICDs at Mayo Clinic (1991-2008).
- Analysis of implantation diagnoses, indications (secondary vs. primary prevention), and complications.
- Assessment of follow-up duration, mortality, transplant rates, and ICD shock occurrences.
Main Results:
- No major implant-related complications were observed in 73 adults receiving 85 ICDs.
- Appropriate shocks for ventricular arrhythmias occurred in 19% of patients; inappropriate shocks in 15%.
- Increased subpulmonic ventricular pressure was associated with a higher likelihood of appropriate shocks.
Conclusions:
- Transvenous ICD implantation is associated with low complication rates in adults with congenital heart disease.
- ICD therapy demonstrates a high likelihood of appropriate treatment for lethal ventricular arrhythmias in this population.
- The data suggest a net benefit of ICD therapy for adults with congenital heart disease requiring arrhythmia management.
Abstract:
Adults with congenital heart disease are at risk of lethal ventricular arrhythmias and are candidates for implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy, yet implant risks, long-term outcomes, and rates of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapies are not well characterized. We reviewed clinical, implantation, and follow-up data on all transvenous ICDs in adults with congenital heart disease at the Mayo Clinic from 1991 through 2008. Seventy-three adults with congenital heart disease received 85 ICDs. Implantation diagnoses included tetralogy of Fallot (44%) and congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (17%). Implantation indication was occurrence of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (secondary prevention) in 36% and prophylactic (primary prevention) in the remainder. There were no major implant-related complications. During follow-up (2.2 ± 2.8 years, range 0 to 15) 11 patients died and 4 patients received heart or heart/lung transplants. An appropriate shock for a ventricular arrhythmia was observed in 19% of patients and an inappropriate shock was observed in 15% of patients. Likelihood of an appropriate shock was associated with increased subpulmonic ventricular pressure. In conclusion, implantation of transvenous ICDs in adults with congenital heart disease is associated with a low risk of implant complications. In this high-risk adult population the rate of inappropriate ICD shocks is low, whereas the likelihood of appropriate therapy for potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias is high. These data suggest overall benefit of ICD therapy in adults with congenital heart disease.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
