Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Treating Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Patients with Multicolumn-lead Spinal Cord Stimulation
Published on: June 26, 2018
Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: patient selection, service provision and operative technique
T C Dudding1, J R Hollingshead, R J Nicholls
1Physiology Unit, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK.
Aim:
Faecal incontinence is estimated to affect between 2 and 3% of Western adult populations. In recent years sacral nerve stimulation has become an important treatment modality, often as the first-line surgical therapy. The aim of this article was to review the current evidence regarding patient selection and surgical technique and to evaluate the logistics of providing a neurostimulation service.
Method:
A Medline search was performed including the keywords and/or MeSH headings of sacral nerve stimulation, neuromodulation, artificial pacemaker, faecal incontinence, patient selection, predictive factors and anal canal. Further studies were identified by cross-referencing from relevant articles and by appraisal of recent peer-reviewed conference abstracts and proceedings.
Results:
Despite the success of sacral nerve stimulation for several pathophysiological causes of incontinence, case selection is of paramount importance. Sacral nerve stimulation should not be offered outside a multidisciplinary pelvic floor unit. Temporary evaluation using diary cards can lead to false positive and negative results. Adherence to a meticulous surgical technique, using low amplitude stimulation to guide lead placement, provides optimal clinical outcome.
Conclusion:
The short-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation is dependent on patient factors and operative technique. Despite this, specific preoperative predictive factors of treatment success have yet to be identified.
