Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...
Surveys02:16

Surveys

Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
Attitudes01:54

Attitudes

Attitude is our evaluation of a person, an idea, or an object. We have attitudes for many things ranging from products that we might pick up in the supermarket to people around the world to political policies. Typically, attitudes are favorable or unfavorable: positive or negative (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993). And, they have three components: an affective component (feelings), a behavioral component (the effect of the attitude on behavior), and a cognitive component (belief and knowledge;...
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Smoking in Patients With Cancer: Guidance for Delivering Effective Tobacco Treatment in Cancer Care.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2026
Same author

Reach, Acceptability, and Effectiveness of Proactive Outreach and Varenicline with Cancer-Focused Counseling for Patients with Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial.

JCO oncology advances·2026
Same author

Rethinking Smoking: Cannabis, Tobacco, and Lung Cancer.

Chest·2026
Same author

Disparities in Receipt of Tobacco Cessation Advice Among U.S. Adult Healthcare Patients Who Use Tobacco.

AJPM focus·2025
Same author

Cannabis use among adults who smoke tobacco: Relations with switching from combusted cigarettes to e-cigarettes or very low nicotine cigarettes.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2025
Same author

Wisconsin Young Adults' Attitudes, Beliefs, Motivations, and Behaviors Surrounding E-Cigarette Use and Cessation.

WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

Contextual Variation in Automatic Evaluative Bias to Racially-Ambiguous Faces.

Tiffany A Ito1, Eve C Willadsen-Jensen, Jesse T Kaye

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Boulder.

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
|June 22, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Implicit biases are influenced by facial features and context. Racially ambiguous faces activate biases, with effects varying based on surrounding racial contexts, impacting perceptions of race.

More Related Videos

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Racial Perception

Background:

  • Automatic evaluative associations are crucial in social cognition.
  • Previous research indicates biases toward racial groups, but less is known about racially ambiguous faces.
  • The influence of external context on racial perception and bias is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate implicit evaluative associations activated by racially-ambiguous Black-White faces.
  • To examine how the racial context influences perceptions of racially-ambiguous faces.
  • To determine the interplay between facial features and contextual factors in shaping racial bias.

Main Methods:

  • Three studies were conducted using racially-ambiguous Black-White faces.
  • Evaluated implicit evaluative associations and racial-prototypicality judgments.
  • Manipulated the racial context (e.g., White-only, Black-only, mixed-race) in which faces were presented.

Main Results:

  • A graded pattern of bias was observed against racially-ambiguous faces, weaker than bias to Black faces but stronger than to White faces.
  • Significant bias was present in a White-only context but not in a Black-only context.
  • Contextual factors induced perceptual contrast effects, altering judgments of racial prototypicality for ambiguous faces.

Conclusions:

  • Both intrinsic facial properties (racial ambiguity) and external contextual factors significantly affect automatic evaluative associations.
  • The racial composition of the surrounding environment influences how ambiguous faces are perceived and evaluated.
  • Findings highlight the dynamic nature of racial perception and bias, shaped by both individual face characteristics and situational cues.