Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Making time for a dynamic attentional priority map.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

The Shape of Saccade-based Functional Visual Fields (FVFs): A cautionary note.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

A common signal-strength factor limits awareness and precise knowledge of multiple moving objects across the adult lifespan.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Intrinsic motivation and false feedback reduce the low prevalence effect.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2025
Same author

Incidental Learning of Temporal and Spatial Associations in Hybrid Search.

Visual cognition·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Target absent trials in configural contextual cuing.

Melina A Kunar1, Jeremy M Wolfe

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK. m.a.kunar@warwick.ac.uk

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|June 22, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Contextual cuing (CC) relies on target-distractor associations. When targets are sometimes absent or their locations vary, CC effects diminish, highlighting the importance of consistent spatial learning for faster reaction times.

More Related Videos

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception
  • Human Attention

Background:

  • Contextual cuing (CC) enhances target detection in familiar visual scenes.
  • Previous research primarily used displays where targets were always present.
  • The role of target absence and spatial variability in CC remains underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of target absence on contextual cuing.
  • To examine how spatial variability affects CC formation and expression.
  • To determine the underlying mechanisms of CC, focusing on target-distractor associations.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments varied target presence (always present, always absent, sometimes absent).
  • Spatial layouts were manipulated to include target-present and target-absent trials.
  • Response tasks were altered between orientation and detection to assess task dependency.

Main Results:

  • Configural CC occurred when targets were always present but not when always absent.
  • CC was absent when spatial layouts were inconsistently associated with targets.
  • Distractors in previously learned target locations disrupted CC, especially in consistent contexts.
  • Changing the task from orientation to detection eliminated CC.

Conclusions:

  • Contextual cuing is critically dependent on consistent target-distractor associations.
  • Spatial learning in CC is sensitive to the predictability of target presence.
  • CC effects are linked to response selection mechanisms and are modulated by task demands.