Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Dual-mode Imaging of Cutaneous Tissue Oxygenation and Vascular Function
Published on: December 8, 2010
Multivariate classification of systemic vascular resistance using photoplethysmography
Qim Y Lee1, Gregory S H Chan, Stephen J Redmond
1Biomedical Systems Laboratory, School of Electrical Engineering and Telecommunications, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Abstract:
Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) classification is useful for the diagnosis and prognosis of critical pathophysiological conditions, with the ability to identify patients with abnormally high or low SVR of immense clinical value. In this study, a supervised classifier, based on Bayes' rule, is employed to classify a heterogeneous group of intensive care unit patients (N = 48) as being below (SVR < 900 dyn s cm(-5)), within (900 ⩽ SVR ⩽ 1200 dyn s cm(-5)) or above (SVR > 1200 dyn s cm(-5)) the clinically accepted range for normal SVR. Features derived from the finger photoplethysmogram (PPG) waveform and other routine cardiovascular measurements (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) were used as inputs to the classifier. In the construction of the classifier model, two techniques were used to approximate the class conditional probability densities--a single Gaussian distribution model (also known as discriminant analysis) and a non-parametric model using the Parzen window kernel density estimation method. An exhaustive feature search was performed to select a feature subset that maximized the performance indicator, Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ). The Gaussian model with multiple features achieved the best overall kappa coefficient (κ = 0.57), although the results from the non-parametric model were comparable (κ = 0.51). The optimum subset in the Gaussian model consisted of PPG waveform variability features, including the low-frequency to high-frequency ratio (LF/HF) and the normalized mid-frequency power (MF(NU)), in addition to the PPG pulse wave features, such as pulse width, peak-to-notch time, reflection index, and notch time ratio. The classifier performed particularly well in discriminating low SVR, with a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 86%, positive predictive value of 88% and a negative predictive value of 82%. The results highlight the feasibility of deploying a multivariate statistical approach of SVR classification in the clinical setting, simply using a non-invasive and easy-to-measure PPG waveform signal.
Related Concept Videos
Vascular Resistance
The primary determinants of vascular resistance are vessel diameter, blood viscosity, and vessel length. Among these, vessel diameter plays the most significant role due to the fourth power relationship described by...
Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
Autoregulation of Blood Flow
Chemical Signaling in Autoregulation
Chemical signaling operates at the precapillary sphincter level, inciting either contraction or relaxation.
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above the...
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:

