Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Quantitative Atomic-Site Analysis of Functional Dopants/Point Defects in Crystalline Materials by Electron-Channeling-Enhanced Microanalysis
Published on: May 10, 2021
Modeling local structure using crystal field and spin Hamiltonian parameters: the tetragonal Fe(K)(3+)-O(I)(2-)
P Gnutek1, Z Y Yang, C Rudowicz
1Institute of Physics, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Aleja Piastów 17, 70-310 Szczecin, Poland.
Abstract:
The local structure and the spin Hamiltonian (SH) parameters, including the zero-field-splitting (ZFS) parameters D and (a+2F/3), and the Zeeman g factors [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], are theoretically investigated for the Fe(K)(3+)-O(I)(2-) center in KTaO(3) crystal. The microscopic SH (MSH) parameters are modeled within the framework of the crystal field (CF) theory employing the CF analysis (CFA) package, which also incorporates the MSH modules. Our approach takes into account the spin-orbit interaction as well as the spin-spin and spin-other-orbit interactions omitted in previous studies. The superposition model (SPM) calculations are carried out to provide input CF parameters for the CFA/MSH package. The combined SPM-CFA/MSH approach is used to consider various structural models for the Fe(K)(3+)-O(I)(2-) defect center in KTaO(3). This modeling reveals that the off-center displacement of the Fe(3+) ions, Δ(1)(Fe(3+)), combined with an inward relaxation of the nearest oxygen ligands, Δ(2)(O(2-)), and the existence of the interstitial oxygen O(I)(2-) give rise to a strong tetragonal crystal field. This finding may explain the large ZFS experimentally observed for the Fe(K)(3+)-O(I)(2-) center in KTaO(3). Matching the theoretical MSH predictions with the available structural data as well as electron magnetic resonance (EMR) and optical spectroscopy data enables predicting reasonable ranges of values of Δ(1)(Fe(3+)) and Δ(2)(O(2-)) as well as the possible location of O(I)(2-) ligands around Fe(3+) ions in KTaO(3). The defect structure model obtained using the SPM-CFA/MSH approach reproduces very well the ranges of the experimental SH parameters D, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] and importantly yields not only the correct magnitude of D but also the sign, unlike previous studies. More reliable predictions may be achieved when experimental data on (a+2F/3) and/or crystal field energy levels become available. Comparison of our results with those arising from alternative models existing in the literature indicates considerable advantages of our method and presumably higher reliability of our predictions.
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Stoichiometric Point Defects
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Non-Stoichiometric Defects
Imperfections in Crystal Structure: Point, Line and Plane Defects
Valence Bond Theory

