Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Patients with left bundle branch block pattern and high cardiac risk myocardial SPECT: does the current management
T J F Ten Cate1, J C Kelder, H W M Plokker
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435, CM, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands, timtencate@yahoo.com.
Insights
Myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) effectively stratifies cardiovascular risk in patients with left bundle branch block or ventricular pacing. A low-risk MPS indicates watchful waiting, while high-risk MPS warrants further investigation and treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) is a key tool for cardiovascular risk stratification.
- Its utility in patients with abnormal ventricular electrical activation, such as left bundle branch block (LBBB) or ventricular pacing, remains debated.
- This review evaluates the prognostic value of MPS in these specific patient populations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness of MPS in risk stratifying patients with intrinsic LBBB or LBBB secondary to right ventricular apical pacing.
- To determine the prognostic implications of low-risk versus high-risk MPS findings in these cohorts.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE database was conducted from January 1980 to September 2010.
- Search terms included "prognosis" or "prognostic value" combined with "SPECT" and "LBBB" or "pacing" or "pacemakers."
- Eleven studies were identified and reviewed, categorizing MPS results as low or high risk based on original definitions.
Main Results:
- A low-risk MPS result was consistently associated with a low incidence of cardiac events.
- High-risk MPS findings indicated a significantly elevated risk of cardiac events, with a 4.8-fold increased risk (95% CI [3.2 - 7.2], p < 0.0001).
- These prognostic indicators remained largely unchanged over time, despite advancements in secondary prevention and patient care.
Conclusions:
- Low-risk MPS results support a strategy of watchful waiting for patients with LBBB or ventricular pacing.
- High-risk MPS necessitates further diagnostic evaluation and prompt therapeutic intervention.
- The sustained high rates of cardiac death and myocardial infarction following high-risk MPS suggest current management strategies for these patients may be insufficient and require re-evaluation.
Introduction:
Myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) is frequently used for cardiovascular risk stratification. The significance of MPS in patients with abnormal electrical ventricular activation is often questionable. This review assesses the value of MPS for risk stratification of patients with intrinsic left bundle branch block or that due to right ventricular apical pacing.
Methods:
We reviewed the literature by a search of the MEDLINE database (January 1980 to September 2010). The terms prognosis or prognostic value were combined with SPECT and LBBB or pacing or pacemakers. MPS was categorised as low and high risk according to the original definitions.
Results:
We identified 11 studies suitable for review. A low-risk MPS is associated with a low risk of cardiac events whereas high-risk MPS carries a 4.8-fold increased risk, 95% CI [3.2 - 7.2] (p < 0.0001). Despite secondary prevention and an improved medical and interventional care, these figures have hardly changed over time.
Conclusion And Clinical Implications:
A low-risk MPS permits a policy of watchful waiting whereas a high-risk MPS requires further analysis and treatment. The persistent high cardiac death and acute myocardial infarction rate after a high-risk MPS suggest that the current management of these patients does not suffice and needs reconsideration.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy

