Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Biofield therapies in cardiovascular disease management: a brief review
Joel G Anderson1, Ann Gill Taylor
1Center for the Study of Complementary and Alternative Therapies, School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Insights
Complementary therapies like biofield therapies may offer benefits for cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients seeking alternatives to standard treatments. These nursing-developed energy therapies may impact CVD risk factors and improve quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Integrative medicine and nursing
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) management
- Biofield therapies
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading global cause of death and disability despite therapeutic advances.
- Conventional CVD therapies often have side effects, prompting patients to explore non-pharmacological options.
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) encompasses diverse modalities used alongside conventional healthcare.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of three biofield therapies utilized in nursing: Therapeutic Touch, Reiki, and Healing Touch.
- To survey the application of these biofield therapies in individuals diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD).
- To examine potential outcomes of biofield therapies on CVD risk factors and health-related quality of life.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on biofield therapies within the CAM domain.
- Focus on Therapeutic Touch, Reiki, and Healing Touch as nursing-utilized interventions.
- Analysis of studies investigating the impact of these therapies on CVD patients.
Main Results:
- Biofield therapies involve directing healing energy to influence the body's energy field for health and well-being.
- These interventions are explored for their potential to affect CVD risk factors.
- Outcomes related to health-related quality of life in CVD patients receiving biofield therapies are surveyed.
Conclusions:
- Biofield therapies represent a component of CAM that nurses may use to complement standard CVD care.
- Further research is warranted to fully understand the efficacy of biofield therapies for CVD management.
- These energy-based interventions show potential for improving patient outcomes and quality of life in cardiovascular care.
Abstract:
Though there have been advances over the last 30 years in the therapeutic approaches to cardiovascular disease (CVD), heart disease and stroke remain the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Many medical therapies for CVD are associated with a number of side effects, often leading patients to seek non-pharmacological treatments to complement standard care. Referred to as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), these therapies consist of a heterogeneous group of modalities used in addition to conventional health care. Biofield therapies exist within this CAM domain and involve the direction of healing energy to facilitate general health and well-being by modifying the energy field. What follows is a brief overview of three biofield therapies developed or used within the field of nursing (Therapeutic Touch, Reiki, and Healing Touch), surveying the use of these interventions for individuals with CVD, and outcomes that may impact CVD risk factors and health-related quality of life.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care