Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Next-generation Sequencing03:00

Next-generation Sequencing

The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

RLBWT-based LCP computation in compressed space for terabase-scale pangenome analysis.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Hemoglobin's α-Helix-to-β-Sheet Transition Enables Targeted mRNA Delivery to the Lung.

Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)·2026
Same author

Multi-omics reveals that burdock seed aglycone alleviates renal fibrosis by restoring mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation function.

Journal of proteomics·2026
Same author

Vision transformer autoencoders captures local and non-local features in brain imaging to reveal novel genetic associations.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Replicability of unsupervised deep learning derived image phenotypes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Genetic architecture of white matter microstructure captured by unsupervised deep representation learning of fractional anisotropy maps.

Nature communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

Statistical quantification of methylation levels by next-generation sequencing.

Guodong Wu1, Nengjun Yi, Devin Absher

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.

Plos One
|June 24, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We developed a Bayesian method for accurate DNA methylation quantification from Methyl-Seq data, outperforming existing methods. This advancement is crucial for large-scale epigenotyping and association studies.

More Related Videos

Methyl-binding DNA capture Sequencing for Patient Tissues
08:40

Methyl-binding DNA capture Sequencing for Patient Tissues

Published on: October 31, 2016

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing
08:38

Targeted DNA Methylation Analysis by Next-generation Sequencing

Published on: February 24, 2015

Methyl-binding DNA capture Sequencing for Patient Tissues
08:40

Methyl-binding DNA capture Sequencing for Patient Tissues

Published on: October 31, 2016

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis
12:34

DNA Methylation: Bisulphite Modification and Analysis

Published on: October 21, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Epigenetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Next-generation sequencing technologies like Methyl-Seq offer high-resolution, low-cost DNA methylation profiling.
  • Existing quantification methods for sequencing-based methylation data are simplistic and do not adequately address noise and experimental artifacts.
  • Accurate quantification is essential for large-scale epigenotyping and phenotypic association studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate statistical issues in DNA methylation quantification for emerging sequencing technologies.
  • To develop accurate quantification methods for Methyl-Seq data.
  • To compare proposed methods with existing ones.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed two quantification methods for Methyl-Seq data: Maximum Likelihood (ML) estimate and a Bayesian hierarchical model.
  • The Bayesian method allows for variance estimation and adjustment of technical bias.
  • Compared ML, Bayesian, and a previously proposed binary method using simulations and real Methyl-Seq data.

Main Results:

  • The Bayesian method provided the most accurate quantification for Methyl-Seq data in both simulations and real data analyses.
  • The ML method was slightly less accurate than the Bayesian method but outperformed the binary method.
  • Methyl-Seq achieved comparable quantification consistency to microarrays with sufficient sequencing depth (40-300x).

Conclusions:

  • The Bayesian hierarchical model is a superior method for accurate DNA methylation quantification from Methyl-Seq data.
  • The developed methods offer significant improvements over existing simplistic approaches.
  • Methyl-Seq, with appropriate quantification and sufficient sequencing depth, is a viable technology for large-scale epigenotyping.