Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
Quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using freeware package (cardioBull)
Koichi Okuda1, Kenichi Nakajima, Tetsuo Hosoya
1Department of Biotracer Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Science, 13-1 Takara-machi, Kanazawa, 920-8641, Japan. okuda@nmd.m.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
The new cardioBull software demonstrates high diagnostic performance for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) using myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Its accuracy is comparable to existing commercial software, offering a reliable freeware alternative for CAD assessment.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging Analysis
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis relies on accurate myocardial perfusion imaging.
- Quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) analysis is crucial for assessing myocardial perfusion.
- Existing commercial software for SPECT analysis can be costly.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a newly developed freeware package, cardioBull, for quantifying myocardial perfusion.
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy of cardioBull with a commercially available software, Quantitative Perfusion SPECT (QPS).
- To assess the utility of cardioBull in detecting coronary artery disease (CAD).
Main Methods:
- 36 patients with CAD and 35 controls underwent stress-rest (99m)Tc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT.
- Coronary angiography confirmed ≥75% stenosis in the CAD group.
- Segmental perfusion defect scores and Summed Stress Scores (SSS) were automatically calculated by both cardioBull and QPS.
- Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine CAD detection performance, calculating Areas Under the ROC Curve (AUC).
Main Results:
- Mean SSS values were similar between cardioBull and QPS (6.0 ± 7.1 vs. 5.6 ± 7.0).
- The AUC for cardioBull (0.91 ± 0.04) was comparable to QPS (0.87 ± 0.04), indicating equivalent diagnostic performance.
- CardioBull demonstrated high overall sensitivity (89%), specificity (74%), and accuracy (82%) for CAD detection.
- Regional analysis showed the highest AUC in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery territory for both software packages.
Conclusions:
- The developed cardioBull software exhibits high diagnostic performance for detecting CAD.
- CardioBull provides comparable diagnostic accuracy to the commercial QPS software.
- CardioBull represents a promising freeware solution for myocardial perfusion SPECT analysis in CAD detection.
