Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round end"...
Color Vision01:24

Color Vision

Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Longitudinal associations of DNA-methylation of OXT, SLC6A4 and NR3C1 genes with the treatment response in patients with depression.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

The influence of repeating stimuli on task set inhibition following task execution and mere task preparation.

Acta psychologica·2026
Same author

Forecasting Perception Before It Happens: Context-Specific Connectivity Patterns Predict Perceptual Outcomes.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The Influence of Prime-Related Trial-Wise Visibility Measures on Masked Response Priming.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Using speed to think about space and time.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Attraction versus repulsion: Are central tendency effects and duration adaptation effects based on an altered perception of time?

Acta psychologica·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Distractor-induced blindness for orientation changes and coherent motion.

Lars Michael1, Guido Hesselmann, Markus Kiefer

  • 1Department of Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195 Berlin, Germany. lars.michael@fu-berlin.de

Vision Research
|June 28, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Distractor effects on visual perception depend on shared features. Motion or orientation distractors impair target detection only when they match the target

More Related Videos

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes
06:25

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes
06:25

Motion-Acuity Test for Visual Field Acuity Measurement with Motion-Defined Shapes

Published on: February 23, 2024

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual perception

Background:

  • Distractors can impair conscious perception of visual stimuli.
  • The motion blindness paradigm shows impaired motion detection with irrelevant motion distractors.
  • Feature specificity of distractor effects requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the feature specificity of distractor effects in visual perception.
  • To determine if distractors must share characteristics with targets to impair detection.
  • To explore how ambiguous target characteristics influence distractor inhibition.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted.
  • Targets were defined by either motion coherence or orientation changes.
  • Distractor effects on target detectability were measured.

Main Results:

  • Distractors impaired target detectability only when they shared feature characteristics with the target.
  • Independent inhibition mechanisms for visual features can be activated.
  • Ambiguous target characteristics can lead to the activation of independent inhibition sets.

Conclusions:

  • Distractor effects in visual perception are feature-specific.
  • Shared features between distractors and targets are crucial for modulating perception.
  • The visual system employs flexible inhibition strategies based on target ambiguity.