Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

A Syngeneic Mouse Model of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma for Quantitative and Longitudinal Assessment of Preclinical Therapies
Published on: April 12, 2017
Multikinase inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: indirect comparison meta-analysis
Henry W C Leung1, Agnes L F Chan
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taiwan.
Background:
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of multikinase inhibitors sunitinib, sorafenib, and pazopanib have reported efficacy compared with results from placebo and interferon-α (INF-α). To date, these drugs have not been compared in head-to-head trials.
Objective:
To review systematically the evidence of clinical effectiveness of multikinase inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and, via an indirect meta-analysis, to determine an optimal treatment among these agents.
Methods:
A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CANCERLIT, and Cochrane controlled trials register databases was performed. All RCTs of multikinase inhibitors (sorafenib, sunitinib, and pazopanib) used to treat mRCC were included. The study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 reviewers, with all disagreements being resolved by consensus. The effects of multikinase inhibitors on progression-free survival (PFS) were compared using an indirect treatment comparison method with INF-α or placebo as a comparator.
Results:
Four studies were included. Two studies examined sunitinib or sorafenib versus IFN-α, and the other 2 studies investigated sorafenib or pazopanib versus placebo. Compared with placebo, 2 interventions reported improvement for PFS (sorafenib: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44, P = 0.01; pazopanib: HR = 0.46, P = 0.0001), whereas only sunitinib improved PFS over IFN-α (HR = 0.539, P = 0.001). An indirect comparison suggests that sunitinib is likely to demonstrate greater clinical benefit than sorafenib in terms of PFS (HR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.316-0.713; P < 0.001), using IFN-α as the comparator. Sorafenib was not statistically different from pazopanib using placebo as the comparator in the indirect comparison (HR = 0.957; 95% CI, 0.657-1.39; P = 0.24).
Conclusion:
Some multikinase inhibitors have a favorably reported PFS for patients with mRCC compared with results using IFN-α or placebo. Our findings suggest that sunitinib might offer some clinical benefit over sorafenib in terms of PFS. No statistical difference was found between sorafenib and pazopanib treatments. However, these conclusions are based on 2 indirect comparisons of single RCTs. More RCTs are required to confirm these findings and investigate the clinical effectiveness of multikinase inhibitors in the treatment of mRCC.
Insights
Sunitinib may offer improved progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) compared to sorafenib. While sorafenib and pazopanib showed similar PFS, further randomized controlled trials are needed for definitive conclusions on these multikinase inhibitors.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Multikinase inhibitors like sunitinib, sorafenib, and pazopanib have shown efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).
- Head-to-head comparisons between these agents are lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the clinical effectiveness of multikinase inhibitors for mRCC.
- To conduct an indirect meta-analysis to identify the optimal treatment among these agents.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of major databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CANCERLIT, Cochrane).
- Inclusion of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of sunitinib, sorafenib, and pazopanib in mRCC.
- Indirect treatment comparison meta-analysis using interferon-alfa (IFN-α) or placebo as comparators to assess progression-free survival (PFS).
Main Results:
- Sunitinib improved PFS over IFN-α (HR = 0.539).
- Sorafenib (HR = 0.44) and pazopanib (HR = 0.46) improved PFS compared to placebo.
- Indirect comparison suggested sunitinib may offer greater PFS benefit than sorafenib (HR = 0.47).
- No significant PFS difference was found between sorafenib and pazopanib (HR = 0.957).
Conclusions:
- Multikinase inhibitors demonstrate favorable PFS in mRCC compared to IFN-α or placebo.
- Sunitinib may provide a clinical benefit in PFS over sorafenib.
- Further RCTs are necessary to confirm these findings and fully evaluate multikinase inhibitors in mRCC treatment.

