Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of eculizumab withdrawal in atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome: the SETS aHUS multi-centre, open-label, prospective and single-arm study.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2026

Same author

Temporal clustering of neuroblastic tumours in children and young adults from Scotland.

Environmental health : a global access science source·2026

Same author

Commentary: Low-dose ionizing radiation and the exposure-lag response: protocol for a prospective cohort study on The Health Effects of Chongqing Occupational Radiation Workers.

Frontiers in public health·2026

Same author

The risk of basal and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin cancer incidence and external radiation in the updated National Registry for radiation workers cohort in the UK.

International journal of cancer·2025

Same author

A Historical Survey of Key Epidemiological Studies of Ionizing Radiation Exposure.

Radiation research·2024

Same author

Extended analysis of solid cancer incidence among nuclear industry workers in the UK 1955-2011: comparison of workers first hired in earlier and later periods.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2024

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

Two error components model for measurement error: application to radon in homes.

Nezahat Hunter¹, Colin R Muirhead, Jon C H Miles

¹Health Protection Agency, CRCE (Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards), Chilton, Oxon OX11 0RQ, UK. nezahat.hunter@hpa.org.uk

Journal of Environmental Radioactivity

|June 28, 2011

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new statistical model improves analysis of radon variability in homes by incorporating both additive and multiplicative errors. This approach offers a better fit for diverse radon measurement datasets, enhancing accuracy in home radon testing.

More Related Videos

The Frequency Domain Thermoreflectance Technique for Thermal Property Measurements

The Frequency Domain Thermoreflectance Technique for Thermal Property Measurements

Published on: December 5, 2025

Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS

Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS

Published on: February 17, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

The Frequency Domain Thermoreflectance Technique for Thermal Property Measurements

The Frequency Domain Thermoreflectance Technique for Thermal Property Measurements

Published on: December 5, 2025

Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS

Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS

Published on: February 17, 2018

Area of Science:

Environmental Science
Statistical Modeling
Public Health

Background:

Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that can accumulate in homes.
Variability in indoor radon concentrations poses challenges for accurate risk assessment.
Existing models may not fully capture the sources of radon variability.

Purpose of the Study:

To test a simple statistical model for analyzing indoor radon concentration variability.
To incorporate both additive and multiplicative error components and between-house variation.
To evaluate the model's performance against existing approaches using real-world datasets.

Main Methods:

A Bayesian statistical approach was employed for model analysis.
The model was applied to two distinct datasets of repeat home radon measurements.
Datasets included short-term (3-month) and long-term (6-month) measurements across various concentration levels.

Main Results:

The proposed model, with two error components, demonstrated a superior fit to the analyzed datasets.
This improved fit was observed compared to a model utilizing only multiplicative errors.
The model effectively accounts for both measurement error and inherent radon variability.

Conclusions:

A two-component error model provides a more robust analysis of indoor radon variability.
This enhanced modeling approach can improve the accuracy of radon risk assessments in residential settings.
The findings support the use of this model for analyzing diverse radon measurement data.