Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026
14:14
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
Innovative foraging behaviour in birds: what characterizes an innovator?
Sarah E Overington1, Laure Cauchard, Kimberly-Ann Côté
1Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 avenue Docteur Penfield, Montréal, Québec, H3A 1B1 Canada. sarah.overington@mail.mcgill.ca
Behavioural Processes
|June 28, 2011
Summary
Carib grackles (Quiscalus lugubris) show individual differences in problem-solving innovation. Innovators explored more and feared new objects less than non-innovators, suggesting behavioral traits drive novel foraging strategies.
Area of Science:
- Animal behavior
- Behavioral ecology
- Cognitive ethology
Background:
- Innovative foraging behavior is crucial for adaptation but its emergence and individual variation remain poorly understood.
- Understanding the drivers of behavioral innovation is key to explaining species' ecological success and resilience.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the characteristics distinguishing innovative individuals from non-innovators in Carib grackles (Quiscalus lugubris).
- To explore the factors influencing the latency to innovate in a novel problem-solving task.
Main Methods:
- Presented 36 wild-caught adult male Carib grackles with a novel problem-solving apparatus.
- Compared behavioral and morphological traits of birds that solved the task (innovators) versus those that did not (non-innovators).
- Analyzed exploration scores, object neophobia, learning speed, and interaction patterns with the apparatus.
Main Results:
- Innovativeness was not linked to morphological traits but correlated with higher exploration and lower object neophobia.
- Latency to innovate positively correlated with learning speed among innovators.
- Innovators persisted with correct apparatus interactions, while non-innovators did not, highlighting differences in persistent engagement.
Conclusions:
- Individual differences in exploration and neophobia predict innovative problem-solving in Carib grackles.
- Persistence in interacting with novel stimuli is a key characteristic of successful innovators.
- Behavioral traits, rather than morphology, appear to be primary drivers of innovation in this species.
Related Concept Videos
00:48Optimal Foraging
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
02:07Conservation of Declining Populations
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
01:20Mate Choice
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
01:05Instinctive Drift
Instinctive drift refers to the tendency of animals to revert to their innate behaviors despite repeated reinforcement. Breland and Breland demonstrated this concept in an experiment with a raccoon. The raccoon was trained to pick up two coins and place them in a container in exchange for food. Initially, the raccoon learned to associate the coins with food, making them a conditioned stimulus or a substitute for food. However, over time, the raccoon became less willing to put the coins into the...
02:39Predator-Prey Interactions
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
01:46Types of Selection
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...