Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A carry-over task rule in task switching: an ERP investigation using a Go/Nogo paradigm.

Biological psychology·2012
Same author

[Hemispheric difference in the time course of semantic activation: evidence from event-related potentials].

Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology·2010
Same author

An ERP investigation of task switching using a flanker paradigm.

Brain research·2010
Same author

[Stimulus set and response set in task switching: a comparison using ERP].

Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology·2009
Same author

[Semantic priming within and between the visual fields: an event-related brain potential study].

Shinrigaku kenkyu : The Japanese journal of psychology·2008
Same author

Recognition memory for unfamiliar faces in Parkinson's disease: behavioral and electrophysiologic measures.

Parkinsonism & related disorders·2006

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking
07:00

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

[Asymmetric switch cost: an investigation using lateralized readiness potentials].

Kaoru Umebayashi1, Tsunetaka Okita

  • 1Department of Home and Life Sciences, Gifu Women's University, Taromaru, Gifu 501-2592, Japan. kaoru@gijodai.ac.jp

Shinrigaku Kenkyu : the Japanese Journal of Psychology
|June 29, 2011
PubMed
Summary

Task switching costs are higher for dominant tasks than non-dominant ones. This asymmetry arises from inhibiting the dominant task rule during non-dominant task performance, as shown by reaction times and brain activity.

More Related Videos

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice
07:03

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice

Published on: July 31, 2019

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking
07:00

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice
07:03

Evaluation of Hemisphere Lateralization with Bilateral Local Field Potential Recording in Secondary Motor Cortex of Mice

Published on: July 31, 2019

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
05:22

Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: May 9, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Context:

  • Investigating the cognitive mechanisms underlying task switching.
  • Examining the asymmetry in switch costs between dominant and non-dominant tasks.
  • Exploring the role of rule inhibition in task-set reconfiguration.

Purpose:

  • To determine if the larger switch cost for dominant tasks is due to the inhibition of the dominant task rule during the preceding non-dominant task.
  • To analyze the neural correlates of this cost asymmetry using stimulus-locked lateralized readiness potentials (LRPS).

Summary:

  • Participants performed a task-switching paradigm involving dominant (left-hand to, right-hand to) and non-dominant (right-hand to, left-hand to) tasks.
  • Reaction times indicated asymmetrical switch costs, with larger costs when switching to a dominant task.
  • LRPS data revealed that the dominant task rule was inhibited during non-dominant task performance, but this inhibition did not persist when switching back to the dominant task.

Impact:

  • Provides evidence for proactive inhibition of task rules as a mechanism for cognitive control.
  • Contributes to understanding the neural basis of task switching and cognitive flexibility.
  • Informs the design of training programs and interfaces to optimize performance in dual-task or rapidly switching environments.