Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026
08:24
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Partitioning default effects: why people choose not to choose
Isaac Dinner1, Eric J Johnson, Daniel G Goldstein
1IE Business School, Madrid, Spain. isaac.dinner@ie.edu
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
|June 29, 2011
Summary
Default options significantly influence choices by framing decisions. Understanding reference dependence, a key factor, can help mitigate unintended default effects in consumer behavior and policy design.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Environmental Psychology
Background:
- Default options are prevalent in policy and consumer choice.
- Existing research highlights effort and implied endorsement as key drivers of default effects.
- Reference dependence as a cause for default effects remains less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of reference dependence in default effects.
- To demonstrate how query framing by defaults influences constructed preferences.
- To explore methods for mitigating default effects through query manipulation.
Main Methods:
- Three experiments were conducted.
- The study context involved choosing between incandescent and compact fluorescent light bulbs.
- The impact of different rationales for default effects was measured.
Main Results:
- Default effects were successfully produced across experiments.
- Reference dependence was shown to be a significant factor in the effectiveness of defaults.
- Manipulating the queries formulated by defaults altered constructed preferences and mitigated default effects.
Conclusions:
- Reference dependence is a crucial mechanism underlying default effects.
- Default-generated queries shape consumer preferences.
- Strategic manipulation of queries can reduce the impact of defaults, offering insights for policy and marketing.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
03:26Framing Effects
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
01:20Decision Making
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
01:19Personal Choice and Fate Attributions
Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...
01:38Cognitive Dissonance
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
01:14Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the anxiety of...
01:28Ending Relationships
The dissolution of intimate relationships presents complex emotional and psychological challenges, particularly when emotional bonds are strong, the relationship is long-standing, and perceived alternatives are limited. This distress often intensifies in romantic breakups, where the initiator may experience greater turmoil than the rejected partner. Contributing factors include residual attachment, guilt over causing pain, and uncertainty about how to manage the situation. The stress is further...