Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein-protein Interfaces02:04

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a polypeptide...
Protein Networks02:26

Protein Networks

An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...
Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feature-weighted maximum representative subsampling.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Virus-like and Virus Replicon Particles Targeting Multiple B-Cell Antigens Do Not Protect Against African Swine Fever Virus.

Vaccines·2026
Same author

Risk stratification for renal outcomes in ANCA-associated vasculitides using established scores and histopathological criteria.

Journal of nephrology·2026
Same author

Beyond sequence similarity: ML-powered identification of pHLA off-targets for TCR-mimic antibodies using high throughput binding kinetics.

mAbs·2025
Same author

Prediction of relapses in patients with small vessel vasculitides: a multicenter cohort study on histopathological risk patterns.

Rheumatology international·2025
Same author

Echocardiographic measures read by artificial intelligence enable accurate and rapid prediction of the worsening of heart failure.

European heart journal. Digital health·2025
Same journal

Unified heterogeneity-aware benchmark of drug synergy prediction: a cross-study analysis of traditional machine learning and graph deep learning models.

Journal of cheminformatics·2026
Same journal

Count your bits: fingerprint benchmarking to assess broad chemical space representation.

Journal of cheminformatics·2026
Same journal

Sampling out-of-distribution chemical spaces via Bayesian flow.

Journal of cheminformatics·2026
Same journal

Hold on tight: the kinetic profiling of opioid receptor ligands using the CORAL-MD.

Journal of cheminformatics·2026
Same journal

Transformer-accelerated discovery of inhibitors targeting the RpsA<sub>Δ438</sub> deletion in PZA-resistant tuberculosis.

Journal of cheminformatics·2026
Same journal

DICL: a manually curated database of ion channels and ligands as a useful platform for drug discovery targeting ion channels.

Journal of cheminformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound
10:21

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound

Published on: February 23, 2024

Predicting a small molecule-kinase interaction map: A machine learning approach.

Fabian Buchwald1, Lothar Richter, Stefan Kramer

  • 1Institut für Informatik, Technische Universität München, Boltzmannstr, 3, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany. kramer@in.tum.de.

Journal of Cheminformatics
|June 29, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models predict protein-ligand interactions using kinase-inhibitor binding data. Support Vector Machines (SVM) and decision trees (C5/See5) show promise, outperforming baseline methods for predicting binding affinity.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound
10:21

Protein Target Prediction and Validation of Small Molecule Compound

Published on: February 23, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Computational Biology
  • Drug Discovery
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Presents a novel machine learning approach for predicting protein-ligand interactions.
  • Utilizes a unique dataset of 113 protein kinases and 20 inhibitors from ATP site-dependent binding competition assays.
  • Extracts comprehensive molecular features from diverse data sources for model training.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate machine learning models for predicting kinase-inhibitor binding.
  • To assess the performance of Support Vector Machine (SVM) and C5/See5 decision tree algorithms.
  • To introduce a new evaluation framework for prediction models based on information availability.

Main Methods:

  • Employs Support Vector Machine (SVM) and C5/See5 decision tree algorithms.
  • Utilizes a curated set of molecular features for training and classification.
  • Evaluates model performance using various feature sets, parameter settings, and an external test set.

Main Results:

  • The machine learning approach significantly outperforms baseline methods in most cases.
  • Both SVM and C5/See5 models demonstrate the ability to predict binding affinity to a certain extent.
  • Feature engineering, particularly incorporating active site information for SVMs and alignment scores for C5, enhances prediction accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning methods effectively detect signals in protein-ligand binding data.
  • SVMs benefit from active site features, while C5 performance is improved by feature diversity and alignment scores.
  • The study validates the utility of machine learning in predicting kinase-inhibitor interactions and suggests avenues for further improvement.