Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
Discrepancy between participants' understanding and desire to know in informed consent: are they informed about what
Jiwon Koh1, Eurah Goh, Kyung-Sang Yu
1Department of Family Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, 26 Kangwon Daehakro, Chuncheon, Kangwon Province, South Korea.
Background:
Participants' understanding of clinical trials is important in informed consent. However, little is known about what information participants really want to know.
Aims:
To demonstrate the existence of a discrepancy between participants' understanding and their desire to know.
Methods:
The participants in clinical trials at Seoul National University Hospital were surveyed. The survey consisted of 11 statements based on the essential elements of informed consent. The participants gave two responses to each statement on a five-point Likert scale to rate their subjective understanding and desire to know, respectively. Information discrepancy was defined as the difference between these two ratings: if understanding exceeded desire to know for a particular item, it was defined as 'over-informed'; if desire to know exceeded understanding for a particular item, it was defined as 'under-informed'.
Results:
Participants reported good understanding of 'voluntariness', 'duration', 'study involves research' and poor understanding of 'confidentiality', 'compensation', 'benefits', 'procedures' and 'risks or discomforts'. For 'risks or discomforts', 'who to contact', 'voluntariness', 'duration' and 'procedures', participants reported high desire to know compared with 'confidentiality', 'purpose', 'study involves research' and 'benefits'. The elements 'study involves research', 'voluntariness', 'duration', 'purpose' and 'who to contact' were over-informed, while 'compensation', 'risks or discomforts', 'procedures', 'confidentiality' and 'benefits' were under-informed. Participants over 50 years of age, those without a college education and those whose participation was less voluntary were relatively less informed about the clinical trials.
Conclusions:
An information discrepancy was observed between the participants' understanding and their desire to know. By putting more emphasis on under-informed elements, the quality of informed consent could be improved.
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Blind Procedures
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
Confirmation Biases
Blinding
Self-Discrepancy Theory

