Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026
Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
Published on: March 29, 2022
Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in keratoconus
Jan Darius Unterlauft1, Nina Schädle, Karsten Kasper
1University Eye Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany. j.d.unterlauft@gmx.de
Purpose:
We performed a comparative study using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes with keratoconus.
Methods:
IOP was measured in 114 eyes of 75 patients with keratoconus (51 men and 24 women; mean age, 36.1 ± 11.2 years) using GAT and DCT in randomized order. Central corneal thickness (CCT), minimal corneal thickness (MCT), and corneal topography were recorded using the Pentacam. Four groups according to Amsler's keratoconus classification were composed and analyzed for significant differences of CCT, MCT, GAT, and DCT results.
Results:
Mean CCT in the 114 keratoconus eyes was 481.1 ± 46.2 μm (range, 334-601 μm). Mean MCT was 453.3 ± 56.3 μm (range, 239-573 μm). Mean IOP measured using GAT was 13.1 ± 2.9 mm Hg, whereas mean IOP measured using DCT was 14.8 ± 2.6 mm Hg. Neither the results for GAT nor those for DCT showed a significant correlation with CCT (Pearson correlation: P < 0.05). Multifactorial analysis revealed that CCT and MCT, but not GAT and DCT, results were significantly different in corneas of varying curvatures.
Conclusions:
This study shows that DCT measures IOP higher than GAT in eyes with keratoconus. In keratoconus, both methods seem to be independent of CCT and therefore are equally, but not interchangeably, applicable when monitoring IOP. Further analysis revealed that CCT and MCT are significantly different in corneas of varying Amsler grade.
