Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Modeling Verbal Behavior Deficits with the Stimulus Control Ratio Equation, SCoRE
Published on: May 14, 2019
Symbolic behavior in regular classrooms: a specification of symbolic and non-symbolic behavior
Stefan Billinger1, Torsten Norlander
1School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University Örebro, Sweden.
Abstract:
Students' capabilities to use symbolic information in classroom setting could be expected to influence their possibilities to be active and participating. The development of strategies for teachers to compensate for reduced capability need specific operational definition of symbolic behavior. Fifty-three students, aged 11-13 years old, 29 boys and 24 girls, from three classes in the same Swedish compulsory regular school participated in the current study. After a short training sequence 25 students (47%) were defined as showing symbolic behavior (symbolic), and 28 students (53%) were not (non-symbolic), based on their follow-up test performances. Symbolic and non-symbolic differed significantly on post-test performances (p < 0.05). Surprisingly, non-symbolic behavior deteriorated their performance, while symbolic enhanced their performance (p < 0.05). The results indicate that the operational definition used in the present study may be useful in further studies relating the capability to show symbolic behavior and students' activity and participation in classroom settings.
Related Concept Videos
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development
Observational Learning
Naturalistic Observations
