Pediatric physical therapy in infancy: from nightmare to dream? A two-arm randomized trial
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026
Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Action Observation Training in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Cornill H Blauw-Hospers1, Tineke Dirks, Lily J Hulshof
1Department of Pediatrics-Developmental Neurology, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Insights
Early intervention programs like COPCA show promise for infants at high risk for developmental disorders. Specific therapist behaviors, such as parent coaching, positively correlate with improved developmental outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Developmental Psychology
- Physical Therapy
Background:
- Systematic reviews suggest early motor and general developmental programs enhance development in infants at high risk for motor disorders.
- Parental involvement in promoting infant development is a key component of effective interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of the "Coping With and Caring for Infants With Special Needs" (COPCA) program on the development of high-risk infants.
- To utilize a combined approach of a 2-arm randomized trial and process evaluation.
Main Methods:
- A randomized trial involving 46 high-risk infants (3-6 months corrected age) assigned to COPCA (n=21) or traditional infant physical therapy (TIP) (n=25).
- Developmental outcomes assessed at 3, 6, and 18 months corrected age using standardized measures (neurological exam, AIMS, PEDI, Bayley MDI).
- Intervention content analyzed via video analysis, correlating physical therapy actions with developmental outcomes.
Main Results:
- Overall developmental outcomes were similar between the COPCA and TIP groups.
- COPCA's key actions (family involvement, challenging motor behavior, stimulating at infant's limits) positively correlated with 18-month corrected age developmental outcomes.
- Use of specific handling techniques was negatively associated with the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory outcome.
Conclusions:
- Specific therapist behaviors, particularly parent coaching, are associated with improved developmental outcomes in high-risk infants.
- Further research is needed to determine causality between therapist behavior and developmental outcomes.
- Limitations include small group sizes and variations in therapy session frequency and duration.
Background:
Systematic reviews have suggested that early intervention by means of specific motor training programs and general developmental programs in which parents learn how to promote infant development may be the most promising ways to promote infant motor and cognitive development of infants with or at high risk for developmental motor disorders.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of a recently developed pediatric physical therapy intervention program ("Coping With and Caring for Infants With Special Needs" [COPCA]) on the development of infants at high risk for developmental disorders using a combined approach of a 2-arm randomized trial and process evaluation.
Setting:
The study was conducted at the University Medical Center Groningen in the Netherlands.
Participants And Intervention:
Forty-six infants at high risk for developmental disorders were randomly assigned to receive COPCA (a family-centered program) (n=21) or traditional infant physical therapy (TIP) (n=25) between 3 to 6 months corrected age (CA). Developmental outcome was assessed by blinded assessors at 3, 6, and 18 months CA with a neurological examination, the Alberta Infant Motor Scales, the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, and the Mental Developmental Index (MDI) of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. Contents of the intervention were analyzed by a quantitative video analysis of therapy sessions. Quantified physical therapy actions were correlated to evaluate associations between intervention and developmental outcome components.
Results:
The trial revealed that developmental outcome in both groups was largely identical. Process evaluation showed that typical COPCA actions-(1) family involvement and educational actions, (2) application of a wide variation in challenging the infant to produce motor behavior by himself or herself and allowing the infant to continue this activity, and (3) stimulation of motor behavior at the limit of the infant's capabilities-had positive correlations with developmental outcome at 18 months CA. The use of handling techniques was negatively associated with the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory outcome at 18 months CA.
Limitations:
Major limitations were the limited size of the groups studied and the differences between the groups in frequency and duration of physical therapy sessions.
Conclusion:
Extending the randomized trial with process evaluation was needed to obtain insight into associations between the components of intervention and developmental outcome. Specific therapist behaviors of parent coaching are associated with improved developmental outcome measures. Further studies are needed to examine whether these associations are caused by therapist behavior or whether therapist behavior is modified by children's motor skills.
