Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (Array CGH) for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
Published on: February 21, 2015
What can we learn from old microdeletion syndromes using array-CGH screening?
A L Mosca-Boidron1, S Bouquillon, L Faivre
1Département de Génétique, Laboratoire de Cytogénétique, Plateau Technique de Biologie, 2 rue Angelique Ducoudray, Dijon Cedex, France. anne-laure.mosca-boidron@chu-dijon.fr
Abstract:
Most microdeletion syndromes identified before the implementation of array-comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) were presumed to be well-defined clinical entities. However, the introduction of whole-genome screening led not only to the description of new syndromes but also to the recognition of a broader spectrum of features for well-known syndromes. Here, we report on 10 patients presenting with mental retardation associated with atypical features not suggestive of a known microdeletion and a normal standard karyotype. Array-CGH analyses revealed five microdeletions in the DiGeorge region, three microdeletions in the Williams-Beuren region and two microdeletions in the Smith-Magenis region. Reevaluation in these patients confirmed that the diagnosis remained difficult on clinical grounds and emphasized that well-known genomic disorders can have a phenotype that is heterogeneous and more variable than originally thought. The widespread use of array-CGH shows that such patients may be more readily achieved on the basis of genotype rather than phenotype.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Karyotyping
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
DNA Microarrays

