Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback01:24

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem: self-efficacy,...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Negative and Positive Feedback01:18

Negative and Positive Feedback

Animal organs and organ systems constantly adjust to internal and external changes through a process called homeostasis ("steady state"). Examples of these changes include regulation of the level of glucose or calcium in the blood or internal responses to external temperatures. Homeostasis requires  maintaining an internal dynamic equilibrium:
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Introspection01:29

Introspection

Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Creating Virtual Integration and Improved Oncology Care Quality Through a Co-Management Services Agreement.

Journal of oncology practice·2016
Same author

Second-line treatment outcomes after first-line sunitinib therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Clinical genitourinary cancer·2012
Same author

Reduce risks to patients in your practice.

Journal of oncology practice·2012
Same author

Advance care planning with your patients.

Journal of oncology practice·2012
Same author

A financial counselor on the practice staff: a win-win.

Journal of oncology practice·2011
Same author

Subspecialization in community oncology: option or necessity?

Journal of oncology practice·2011

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Performance appraisal: a tool for practice improvement.

Dean H Gesme1, Marian Wiseman

  • 1Minnesota Oncology, Minneapolis, MN; Wiseman Communications, Washington, DC.

Journal of Oncology Practice
|July 7, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Many oncology practices lack effective performance review systems. Implementing such evaluations is crucial for efficiency, staff morale, and retention in cancer care settings.

More Related Videos

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

Area of Science:

  • Oncology practice management
  • Healthcare administration

Background:

  • Many oncology practices operate without formalized performance review systems.
  • The absence of structured evaluations poses risks to operational efficiency and staff well-being.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the critical need for implementing performance review systems in oncology practices.
  • To underscore the potential negative consequences of inadequate evaluation processes.

Main Methods:

  • This analysis focuses on the implications of lacking a performance review system.
  • Key risks associated with inadequate evaluation are identified.

Main Results:

  • Practices without effective evaluation systems face increased inefficiency.
  • Poor office morale and high staff turnover rates are significant risks.

Conclusions:

  • Establishing an appropriate performance review system is essential for oncology practices.
  • Effective evaluation systems can mitigate risks and improve practice operations.