Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026
07:30
Efficiently Recording the Eye-Hand Coordination to Incoordination Spectrum
Published on: March 21, 2019
Seeing your error alters my pointing: observing systematic pointing errors induces sensori-motor after-effects
Roberta Ronchi1, Patrice Revol, Masahiro Katayama
1INSERM U1028, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, ImpAct Team, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France. r.ronchi@auxologico.it
Plos One
|July 7, 2011
Summary
Observing erroneous movements can induce sensory-motor adaptation without direct participation. This study shows that merely watching incorrect pointing movements can lead to adaptation-like after-effects in observers.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Perception
Background:
- Prism adaptation involves correcting pointing errors caused by optical displacement.
- This process leads to sensory-motor compensation and after-effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if observing erroneous movements can elicit adaptation-like after-effects.
- To determine if passive observation is sufficient for sensory-motor adaptation.
Main Methods:
- Neurotypical participants observed pointing movements from a first-person perspective.
- Observed movements systematically overshot targets, simulating optical deviation.
- Proprioceptive, visual, and visual-proprioceptive shifts were measured before and after observation.
Main Results:
- Observing rightward pointing errors induced a leftward after-effect.
- The effect primarily influenced the observer's proprioceptive sense of their body midline.
- Observers reported an illusion of 'feeling' the observed movement.
Conclusions:
- Sensory-motor after-effects can be elicited through passive observation of movement errors.
- Visual exposure to errors is sufficient to induce adaptation-like phenomena.
- This suggests a potential for observational learning in sensory-motor adaptation.
Related Concept Videos
01:15Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
01:12Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
01:23Actor-Observer Effect
The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in visual...
01:20Random and Systematic Errors
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
01:16Focusing of Light in the Eye
Light rays enter the eye through the cornea, a transparent dome-shaped tissue that is the eye's outermost layer. The cornea bends or refracts, light rays traveling to the pupil. The shape of the cornea determines how much of the light is bent and whether the image will be focused correctly on the retina at the back of the eye. Once the light has passed through both refraction layers, it converges into a single focal point onto a small area. This is where photoreceptors start transforming...
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...