Optimal scaling factors for CM1 and CM3 atomic charges in RM1-based aqueous simulations
Jonah Z Vilseck1, Somisetti V Sambasivarao, Orlando Acevedo
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA.
Abstract:
Scaling factors for atomic charges derived from the RM1 semiempirical quantum mechanical wavefunction in conjunction with CM1 and CM3 charge models have been optimized by minimizing errors in absolute free energies of hydration, ΔG(hyd) , for a set of 40 molecules. Monte Carlo statistical mechanics simulations and free energy perturbation theory were used to annihilate the solutes in gas and in a box of TIP4P water molecules. Lennard-Jones parameters from the optimized potentials for liquid simulations-all atom (OPLS-AA) force field were utilized for the organic compounds. Optimal charge scaling factors have been determined as 1.11 and 1.14 for the CM1R and CM3R methods, respectively, and the corresponding unsigned average errors in ΔG(hyd) relative to experiment were 2.05 and 1.89 kcal/mol. Computed errors in aniline and two derivatives were particularly large for RM1 and their removal from the data set lowered the overall errors to 1.61 and 1.75 kcal/mol for CM1R and CM3R. Comparisons are made to the AM1 method which yielded total errors in ΔG(hyd) of 1.50 and 1.64 kcal/mol for CM1A*1.14 and CM3A*1.15, respectively. This work is motivated by the need for a highly efficient yet accurate quantum mechanical (QM) method to study condensed-phase and enzymatic chemical reactions via mixed QM and molecular mechanical (QM/MM) simulations. As an initial test, the Menshutkin reaction between NH(3) and CH(3) Cl in water was computed using a RM1/TIP4P-Ew/CM3R procedure and the resultant ΔG(‡) , ΔG(rxn) , and geometries were in reasonable accord with other computational methods; however, some potentially serious shortcomings in RM1 are discussed.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Density
Micelles
Molecular Models
Scaling
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a decrease in the...


