Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ordinal Level of Measurement00:55

Ordinal Level of Measurement

The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
Data measured using an ordinal scale are similar to nominal scale data, but there is one major difference. The ordinal scale data can be ordered. An example of ordinal scale data is a list of the top five national parks in the...
Nominal Level of Measurement00:56

Nominal Level of Measurement

The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. Not every statistical operation can be used with every set of data. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal scale is...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who are...
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...
Cattell's Theory of Intelligence01:25

Cattell's Theory of Intelligence

Raymond Cattell, along with John Horn, made significant contributions to our understanding of intelligence by distinguishing between two types: fluid intelligence and crystallized intelligence.
Fluid intelligence involves the capacity to solve new problems and adapt to unfamiliar situations. It's the type of intelligence individuals use when they encounter a novel problem or puzzle that requires innovative thinking. For instance, figuring out how to operate a new gadget relies heavily on fluid...
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial: AI and neuroscience: integrating knowledge, reasoning, and theory of mind.

Frontiers in computational neuroscience·2026
Same author

Legal Decision Biases in GPT: A Comparison with Human Judgment.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Divergent patterns of probabilistic reasoning in humans and GPT-5.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Pathways, predictors and paradoxes of illbeing and wellbeing in older adults: Insights from a UK Biobank study.

PLOS mental health·2026
Same author

An overview of the quantum cognition research program.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

Dwelling on the bad: Negative arguments and stimuli are given more weight in both cumulative and noncumulative tasks.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2025
Same journal

Investigating the origins of partisanship: What motivates children to preferentially endorse their ingroups' claims?

Cognition·2026
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Measuring category intuitiveness in unconstrained categorization tasks.

Emmanuel M Pothos1, Amotz Perlman, Todd M Bailey

  • 1Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK. e.m.pothos@swansea.ac.uk

Cognition
|July 8, 2011
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Category intuitiveness is determined by cluster tightness more than separation. This study examined observer agreement in unsupervised categorization tasks, finding cluster tightness a key factor in how natural categories feel.

More Related Videos

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
07:31

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms

Published on: February 8, 2019

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
14:38

Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning

Published on: November 2, 2012

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Understanding how humans form natural categories is crucial for cognitive science.
  • Unsupervised categorization tasks explore intuitive classification without explicit instruction.
  • Previous models offer varying explanations for category formation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the factors influencing the intuitiveness of categories.
  • To examine observer agreement in unsupervised categorization across diverse stimulus sets.
  • To evaluate the performance of existing unsupervised categorization models.

Main Methods:

  • Employed an unsupervised categorization task with 169 participants.
  • Utilized nine stimulus sets designed to represent different classification structures.
  • Measured category intuitiveness by the frequency of preferred classifications.

Main Results:

  • Cluster tightness was found to be a more significant predictor of category intuitiveness than cluster separation.
  • High observer agreement was observed for some stimulus sets, while others showed low agreement.
  • DIVA, a geometric approach, SUSTAIN, and the UGCM showed good, but not perfect, model fits.

Conclusions:

  • Cluster tightness is a primary driver of perceived category naturalness.
  • Current formal models of unsupervised categorization have limitations.
  • Further theoretical and practical considerations are needed for unsupervised categorization.