Related Experiment Videos
Hourly rounding: challenges with implementation of an evidence-based process
Lynn M Deitrick1, Kathy Baker, Hannah Paxton
1Division of Community Health and Health Studies, Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, Pennsylvania 18105, USA. Lynn.Deitrick@lvhn.org
Journal of Nursing Care Quality
|July 8, 2011
Summary
Implementing hourly rounding, an evidence-based practice, requires careful planning and communication for success in hospital settings. This study highlights the importance of a systematic approach to nursing practice changes.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Practice
- Healthcare Management
- Qualitative Research
Background:
- Implementing evidence-based practice changes in hospitals presents significant challenges.
- Hourly rounding is a key nursing intervention aimed at improving patient care and outcomes.
- Previous attempts at implementing such changes often face unforeseen obstacles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the implementation challenges of hourly rounding on two inpatient units.
- To identify factors contributing to the difficulties encountered during the practice change.
- To provide insights for successful future implementations of nursing practice changes.
Main Methods:
- Ethnographic methods were employed to study the implementation process.
- Data were collected on two similar inpatient units within a hospital.
- Observations and potentially interviews (implied by ethnography) were used to understand the context.
Main Results:
- The study identified specific problems encountered during the implementation of hourly rounding.
- Successful adoption of the practice change was found to be dependent on several key factors.
- The units studied experienced distinct, though related, implementation hurdles.
Conclusions:
- Successful implementation of nursing practice changes like hourly rounding necessitates meticulous planning.
- Effective communication strategies are crucial throughout the implementation process.
- Continuous evaluation and adaptation are vital for sustaining practice changes in healthcare environments.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
Significant Figures in Calculations
Uncertainty in measurements can be avoided by reporting the results of a calculation with the correct number of significant figures. This can be determined by the following rules for rounding numbers:
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...