Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
McNemar's Test01:23

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the Effects of Smartphone Use During Short Breaks on Cognitive Performance and Affective States.

Psychological reports·2026
Same author

Proportional Aggregation in Hierarchical Data Visualization.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2026
Same author

Disentangling individual differences in cognitive response mechanisms for rating scale items: A flexible-mixture multidimensional IRTree approach.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Demotivated, but still attentive: Text disfluency does not affect mind-wandering and reading comprehension, but reduces motivation.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

Disentangling Qualitatively Different Faking Strategies in High-Stakes Personality Assessments: A Mixture Extension of the Multidimensional Nominal Response Model.

Educational and psychological measurement·2025
Same author

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Metacognitive Prospective Memory Inventory-Short Form (MPMI-s) in Non-Central Nervous System Cancer Patients.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 31, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Assessing the validity of multinomial models using extraneous variables: an application to prospective memory.

Jan Rummel1, C Dennis Boywitt, Thorsten Meiser

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. rummel@uni-mannheim.de

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
|July 9, 2011
PubMed
Summary

This study highlights the importance of construct validity in cognitive psychology. Multinomial processing tree models for prospective memory lack convergent validity, indicating they may not accurately differentiate cognitive processes.

More Related Videos

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)
09:05

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)

Published on: June 12, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 31, 2026

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The (Spatial) Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)
09:05

Assessing Working Memory in Children: The Comprehensive Assessment Battery for Children – Working Memory (CABC-WM)

Published on: June 12, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychological Measurement

Background:

  • Multinomial processing tree (MPT) models are widely used in cognitive psychology to understand latent cognitive processes.
  • Model validity is crucial and typically assessed through experimental manipulations or convergent validity with external measures.
  • Construct validity offers a robust framework for evaluating MPT model validity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advance construct validity as a criterion for MPT model evaluation.
  • To investigate the convergent validity of an MPT model of event-based prospective memory.
  • To assess if MPT model parameters can differentiate between prospective memory processes.

Main Methods:

  • Applied construct validity principles to MPT modeling.
  • Examined convergent validity between MPT model parameters and established prospective memory measures.
  • Utilized a range of experimental settings to test the model.

Main Results:

  • A lack of convergent validity was found between the MPT model parameters and external measures of prospective memory.
  • The MPT model for event-based prospective memory did not effectively differentiate between distinct underlying cognitive processes.
  • Results underscore the necessity of rigorous convergent validity testing.

Conclusions:

  • The findings emphasize the critical role of convergent validity in establishing the psychological validity of MPT models.
  • The study suggests limitations in the current MPT model for event-based prospective memory regarding process differentiation.
  • Implications for prospective memory research include the need for more refined models and validation techniques.