Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Continuous Venous-Arterial Doppler Ultrasound During a Preload Challenge
Published on: January 20, 2023
Efficacy and cardiovascular tolerability of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration in acute decompensated heart
Sahar S I Badawy1, Ahmed Fahmy
1Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Cairo University, Egypt. saharbadawyi@yahoo.com
Insights
Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) offers superior fluid and weight loss for congestive heart failure (CHF) patients compared to furosemide. This treatment also reduces intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay safely.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Congestive heart failure (CHF) management often involves fluid overload.
- Continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) is an emerging treatment option for CHF.
- Intravenous furosemide is a standard therapy for fluid management in CHF.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of CVVHDF versus intravenous furosemide in CHF patients.
- To evaluate key outcomes including fluid balance, mortality, and ICU length of stay.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized, comparative trial involving 40 CHF patients.
- Patients were randomized to 72-hour treatment with either CVVHDF or intravenous furosemide.
- Outcomes included weight loss, fluid output, ICU length of stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, and cardiovascular stability.
Main Results:
- CVVHDF group showed significantly greater weight loss and total fluid output (P ≤ .05 and P ≤ .01, respectively).
- ICU LOS was significantly reduced in the CVVHDF group (P ≤ .05).
- Both groups demonstrated improved cardiac output and stroke volume, with decreased pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; CVVHDF was associated with only one instance of transient hypotension.
Conclusions:
- CVVHDF is an effective and safe treatment for fluid management in CHF.
- CVVHDF achieved greater fluid and weight reduction compared to intravenous furosemide.
- CVVHDF led to a shorter ICU length of stay without compromising hemodynamic stability.
Background And Objectives:
Recently, continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) has received increased attention in the treatment of congestive heart failure (CHF). The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of CVVHDF compared with intravenous furosemide in patients with CHF.
Methods:
Forty patients having CHF were included in this prospective, randomized, comparative trial. We randomized patients to treatment for 72 hours with CVVHDF or intravenous furosemide. Outcomes assessed were weight loss, total fluid output, length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU), 30-day mortality, and cardiovascular stability.
Results:
Demographic data were comparable in both groups. Weight loss (P ≤ .05) and total fluid output (P ≤ .01) were greater in the CVVHDF group. Length of stay in the ICU was significantly reduced in the CVVHDF group (P ≤ .05). The mortality rates were comparable in both groups. The cardiac output and the stroke volume significantly increased, whereas the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure significantly decreased (P ≤ .05) in both groups compared with the baseline. A transient attack of hypotension occurred in 1 patient in the CVVHDF group.
Conclusion:
In CHF, the use of CVVHDF effectively and safely produced greater weight and fluid loss and decreased LOS in the ICU more than the intravenous furosemide with no hemodynamic instability.
Related Concept Videos
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration
