Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Identification of Enhancer-Promoter Contacts in Embryoid Bodies by Quantitative Chromosome Conformation Capture (4C)
Published on: April 29, 2020
Identification of functional CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein and Ets protein binding sites in the human chorionic
Aristides Lytras1, Karen Detillieux, Peter A Cattini
1Department of Physiology, University of Manitoba, Room 444, 745 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. aristides.lytras@joslin.harvard.edu
Abstract:
The human chorionic somatomammotropin (CS) A and B genes (listed as CSH1 and CSH2 in the HUGO database) are highly expressed in placenta. A 241 bp potent enhancer, nucleotides (nts) 1-241, located at the 3' end of the CS-B gene (CS-Benh) stimulates promoter activity specifically in placental trophoblast cells in vitro. Strong activity is exerted by a 23 bp element within the CS-Benh (nts 117-139), shown to interact with transcription enhancer factor (TEF) members of the transcription enhancer activator (TEA) DNA-binding domain-containing family. An identical TEF element is present in the homologous (97.5%) CS-Aenh; however, a few nucleotide differences suppress its activity. Previously, we identified regulatory sequences distinct from the TEF element within an 80 bp modulatory domain (nts 1-80) in the CS-Benh. Using structural and functional assays we now show that CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) binding sites exist in the 80 bp modulatory domains of both enhancers, and an Elk-1 binding site exists in the modulatory domain of the CS-Aenh. C/EBPα or C/EBPβ strongly repressed CSp.CAT activity but stimulated CSp.CAT.CS-Benh activity. In contrast, the equivalent CS-A enhancer sequences were unable to relieve promoter repression. Elk-1 overexpression also resulted in differential effects on the CS-Aenh versus CS-Benh. Finally, we provide evidence for the association of C/EBPβ with the CS-A and CS-B genes in human placental chromatin, including differential involvement of C/EBPβ with the CS-Aenh versus the CS-Benh, and therefore consistent with the notion that these are regions of regulatory significance in vivo. We conclude that members of the C/EBP and Ets families can differentially modulate CS-Benh and CS-Aenh activity.
Related Concept Videos
Cell Specific Gene Expression
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
The Eukaryotic Promoter Region

