Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2
Published on: September 18, 2021
Work efficiency: a new criterion for comprehensive comparison and evaluation of statistical methods in large-scale
1College of Life Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, P.R. China. tanyuande@gmail.com
Abstract:
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) has been widely used to evaluate statistical methods, but a fatal problem is that ROC cannot evaluate estimation of the false discovery rate (FDR) of a statistical method and hence the area under of curve as a criterion cannot tell us if a statistical method is conservative. To address this issue, we propose an alternative criterion, work efficiency. Work efficiency is defined as the product of the power and degree of conservativeness of a statistical method. We conducted large-scale simulation comparisons among the optimizing discovery procedure (ODP), the Bonferroni (B-) procedure, Local FDR (Localfdr), ranking analysis of the F-statistics (RAF), the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH-) procedure, and significance analysis of microarray data (SAM). The results show that ODP, SAM, and the B-procedure perform with low efficiencies while the BH-procedure, RAF, and Localfdr work with higher efficiency. ODP and SAM have the same ROC curves but their efficiencies are significantly different.

