Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
Published on: October 11, 2018
Word and Person Effects on Decoding Accuracy: A New Look at an Old Question
Jennifer K Gilbert1, Donald L Compton, Devin M Kearns
1Vanderbilt University.
Knowing all grapheme-phoneme correspondences (GPCs) is not required for decoding words. Lower phonemic awareness and slower naming skills predict poorer decoding in young learners.
Area of Science:
- Psycholinguistics
- Developmental Psychology
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Decoding is a critical skill for reading development.
- Research has identified both individual (person) and word-specific factors influencing decoding accuracy.
- Grapheme-phoneme correspondence (GPC) knowledge is foundational to decoding, but its precise role requires further elucidation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the interplay between person and word factors in decoding.
- To examine the necessity and sufficiency of GPC knowledge for decoding unfamiliar words.
- To analyze how phonemic awareness and rapid naming skills interact with word characteristics in the decoding process.
Main Methods:
- A crossed random-effects model was employed with 196 first-grade students.
- A researcher-developed pseudoword list served as the primary outcome measure.
- GPC knowledge was analyzed as both person-specific and word-specific.
Main Results:
- GPC knowledge was found to be neither necessary nor sufficient for accurate word decoding.
- Controlling for word-specific GPC knowledge, lower phonemic awareness and slower rapid naming significantly predicted lower probabilities of correct decoding.
- A significant person-by-word interaction indicated that students with lower phonemic awareness struggled more with complex vowel graphemes than complex consonant graphemes during decoding.
Conclusions:
- Decoding proficiency is influenced by a complex interaction of individual skills and word properties.
- Phonemic awareness and rapid naming are crucial for applying GPC knowledge, especially for challenging word features.
- Future research should explore these interactions further to inform reading instruction.
More Related Videos
06:48Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: June 25, 2019
05:48Memorization-Based Training and Testing Paradigm for Robust Vocal Identity Recognition in Expressive Speech Using Event-Related Potentials Analysis
Published on: August 9, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Language and Cognition
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
Correspondence Bias
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...