Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Noninvasive Determination of Vortex Formation Time Using Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiac Surgery
Published on: November 28, 2018
Changing nature of cardiac interventions in older adults
John A Dodson1, Mathew S Maurer
1Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, NY, USA.
Insights
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) treatments are increasingly used in older adults, but this population is understudied. Future research must balance intervention risks against benefits like improved quality of life.
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Older adults are a growing demographic with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and mortality.
- Established CVD procedures were validated in younger populations and are now applied to older adults, who are underrepresented in clinical trials.
- While age isn't a contraindication, older adults often have multiple comorbidities and complex physiological profiles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the increasing application of CVD interventions in older adults.
- To underscore the need for research that specifically addresses the unique challenges and benefits of treating CVD in the elderly.
- To inform future research directions balancing intervention risks with quality of life and functional outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Review of current clinical practices and existing literature on CVD interventions in older adults.
- Analysis of the underrepresentation of older adults in clinical trials for procedures like percutaneous coronary intervention and aortic valve replacement.
- Consideration of less invasive percutaneous techniques for managing coronary artery disease and valvular heart disease.
Main Results:
- CVD interventions initially validated in younger populations are increasingly performed on older adults.
- Older adults with CVD are significantly understudied in clinical trials, leading to a lack of specific evidence.
- Less invasive percutaneous techniques offer new management options for CVD in this demographic.
Conclusions:
- Advanced age alone should not be a contraindication for CVD procedures.
- Future research must carefully weigh the potential harms of interventions against benefits such as preventing functional decline and improving quality of life in older adults.
- There is a critical need for clinical trials that include diverse older populations with complex health profiles to guide evidence-based treatment strategies.
Abstract:
Older adults represent a rapidly growing segment of the population in developed countries. Advancing age is the most powerful risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and CVD-related mortality increases markedly in older individuals. Procedures for patients with CVD, including percutaneous coronary intervention, aortic valve replacement and implantable cardioverter defibrillators were all initially validated in younger individuals but are increasingly being applied in older adults who for the most part have been significantly understudied in clinical trials. While advanced age alone is not a contraindication to these procedures, with the advent of less invasive methods to manage CVD including percutaneous techniques to treat both coronary artery disease and valvular heart disease, future research will need to weigh the potential harms of intervention in a population of older adults with multiple medical comorbidities and complex physiologic phenotypes against outcomes that include preventing functional decline and improving quality of life.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients: Effect of Age on Drug Distribution
