Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

Generating the Transcriptional Regulation View of Transcriptomic Features for Prediction Task and Dark Biomarker Detection on Small Datasets
Published on: March 1, 2024
A note on false positives and power in G × E modelling of twin data
Sophie van der Sluis1, Danielle Posthuma, Conor V Dolan
1Complex Trait Genetics, Department of Functional Genomics, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research (CNCR), FALW-VUA, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.vander.sluis@vu.nl
The univariate model for gene-environment interaction can inflate false positive moderation effects when moderators correlate. An extended univariate model mitigates this, but researchers should carefully interpret results or use the full bivariate model for complex gene-environment interactions.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Genetics
- Quantitative Genetics
- Statistical Modeling
Background:
- Gene-environment interaction (GxE) models are crucial for understanding trait etiology.
- Purcell's (2002) variance components models are widely applied for GxE analysis.
- Both bivariate and univariate parameterizations exist, with variance decomposition depending on the moderator (M) and trait (T).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of correlations between moderators (M) and traits (T) on GxE models.
- To identify potential inflation of false positive moderation effects in univariate GxE models.
- To propose and evaluate extensions to univariate GxE models for improved accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of variance components models for GxE.
- Comparison of bivariate and univariate parameterizations under correlated M and T.
- Development and testing of an extended univariate moderation model.
Main Results:
- The standard univariate parameterization significantly increases false positive moderation effects when M and T are correlated, and M is correlated between twins.
- A proposed extension to the univariate model effectively prevents this false positive inflation, assuming the M-T covariance is not moderated.
- If M-T covariance is moderated by M, univariate results require careful interpretation due to potential conflation of effects.
Conclusions:
- Researchers should exercise caution when interpreting univariate GxE moderation effects, especially with correlated moderators and traits.
- The full bivariate moderation model is recommended for studying moderation on the M-T covariance.
- The extended univariate model offers increased power over the bivariate model when M-T covariance moderation is absent or can be ruled out.
Related Concept Videos
Errors In Hypothesis Tests
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Typical Model Studies
Fisher's Exact Test
