Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
When and why people are comparatively optimistic about future health risks: The role of direct and indirect
Jason P Rose1, Jerry Suls, Paul D Windschitl
1Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA. jason.rose4@utoledo.edu
Abstract:
The goal of the current research was to test whether direct versus indirect measures of comparative optimism yield different results as a function of health risk severity and prevalence. A random-digit sample of community residents (N = 259) responded to interview questions about perceived vulnerability using both direct (i.e. self-to-peer risk) and indirect comparison measures (i.e. separate questions about self and peer risk). Responses to direct comparison measures were more affected by prevalence, whereas indirect comparison measures were more affected by severity. These results may offer guidance to researchers and practitioners about when it may be more appropriate to use direct versus indirect measures of comparative health risk.
Related Concept Videos
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
The Availability Heuristic
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Framing Effects
Regression Toward the Mean
